<span>
I feel that the Antony speech maybe would've been more moving.
<span>First off, the murder of Caesar was a traumatizing one (they stabbed
him like twenty seven times or somthing). I would've been on the conspirators sides
if they haven't done it so brutally. IT seemed as if though they did it
out of their own pleasure. Who stabs someone <em>twenty seven </em>times? </span>
Brutus's speech discusses how he loved Caesar (even though he stabbed
him, again, twenty seven times) and how he did it for the good of Rome.
With an ambitious ruler like Caesar, Rome would've become slaves to
him. However, Antony's speech says how he loved Caesar like all of Rome
and how he had helped all of them and how Brutus was a "honorable man"
(sarcasm ). I wouldn't have been moved by Brutus's speech because i had
KNOWN what had happened during the murder. I witnessed it. And how
different it was from out of love for Rome. It seemed more like out of
hatred for Caesar. </span>
Answer:
Richard Connell and Ray Bradbury introduce the reader to experienced hunters who share three common character traits in their short stories. After comparing and contrasting character traits among Rainsford and Zaroff from Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game,” and Eckels from Bradbury’s, “A Sound of Thunder,” one sees that the best hunter of the group is Rainsford. While each character possesses patience, observancy, and the ability to handle pressure, Rainsford uses these traits in the wisest and most proficient manner. Hunters need many different assets, yet patience is one of the most important.
The key to being a successful hunter is being patient. Rainsford demonstrates his patience in many ways during the three days of the most dangerous game. Unlike Rainsford, Eckels shows no patience on his own hunt millions of years prior: “Out of the mist a hundred yards away, came the Tyrannosaurus rex” (Bradbury 84). Rainsford’s patience is the key factor that separates him from Eckels, who becomes frantic during the hunt. Through Ship Trap Island, Zaroff is able to portray his patience as well. Eckels, on the contrary, cannot attain the same sense of imperturbability, because he constantly asks questions: “Eckels flushed. Where’s our Tyrannosaurus?” (Bradbury 84). Zaroff has the ability to slowly guide a ship to provide more participants in the most dangerous game, unlike Eckels, whose prey comes running at him. Eckels simply has no patience, a sharp contrast to both Zaroff and Rainsford. To demonstrate his dedication and commitment, Zaroff says, “So I bought this island, built this house, and here I do my hunting. (Connell 21) Eckels’ lack of patience is unfit for a task such as the most dangerous game. Rainsford’s patience is greater than that of both Zaroff and Eckels. Being patient is a useful trait, but without keen observance, all chances of success are dashed.
Explanation:
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "c. He stood up to Covey and fought back." Frederick Douglass react to Edward Covey, the cruel slave "breaker" who often beat him by standing<span> up to Covey and fought back.</span>
In the sentence: Marta has composed a song, the verb "has composed" is in the present perfect tense. Present perfect tenses have the structure of: has/have + past participle of the verb. Past participles usually end in -ed, except for the irregular verbs.
In comparison, present tense of verbs usually comes with the morpheme -s or -es. Sometimes, they retain the base form. This depends on the type of the verb. Past tense of verbs usually end in -d or -ed, except for irregular verbs. Lastly, past perfect tenses usually has the structure: had + past participle of the verb.