Answer:Not being loud under the pressure, knowing if you step on a floor board too loud you would get caught. Navigating around the annex would get easier because you’d learn where the floor freaks loudly. To make less noise they just didn’t move around a lot so having patience would get more difficult.
Explanation:
At the end of the poem, hope is lost too soon, before the time is right.
We can reach this conclusion because:
- The poem is a great analogy about communism's invasion of Vietnam.
- In the poem, hope is represented by the papaya, which is not ripe enough to be picked.
- Some people want to cut the papaya, even before the right time, to prevent the communists from taking it.
- However, others feel that papaya should be cut when it is fully ripe, as everyone deserves it, including children.
- However, the papaya is cut early in a sad and melancholy way, as it is not ready to be eaten.
In that case, we can conclude that just like the papaya in the poem, some people cut hope out of their hearts very quickly towards the fight against communism and ended up leaving Vietnam too soon, before the right time, which was a sad and melancholic situation.
More information:
brainly.com/question/24742609?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
D.
The test has already been written, and teachers have reviewed the questions thoroughly, so it is too late to make changes now.
Explanation:
Answer:
The author means that now the tools are more important that the message itself.
Explanation:
The excerpt belongs to Small Change: Why the Revolution Won't Be Tweeted, an article written by Malcolm Gladwell, a Canadian journalist and writer. There, he discusses the impact of social media and other new tools in different movements across the world.
In this sentence, Gladwell means that the vehicle the message uses to travel is more important than the message itself. He uses as an example the case of Iran, where people got enough courage to uprise because of social media like Twitter. Even though it is an interesting idea, I don't totally agree with this. I think how the message travels is important, otherwise it could be really important but sterile. There's where the tools take more relevance; sometimes, due to different factors, the tools are faster and more efficient to use communication, but if the message is not relevant, then there are no good reasons to use the tools.
Answer:
This is called a Complex Sentence
Explanation:
Complex sentences contain an independent clause and at least one dependent clause. An independent clause has the ability to stand alone as a sentence. It always makes a complete thought. A dependent clause cannot stand alone, even though it has a subject and a verb.
Example sentence: "I burned dinner, but not the cake."
We see how the first part of this sentence, "I burned dinner", can stand as an independent clause. It can stand as a complete sentence. Whereas the fragment, " but not the cake", is a dependent clause. It needs at least one other independent clause to make it a complete sentence.
