Genghis Khan was a leader with lot of great qualities, and he is regarded as a great leader, one of the greatest in history in fact.
Explanation:
Genghis Khan was a Mongol ruler of the Mongol Empire. He managed to unite the Mongol tribes and make them the greatest power of their time. Genghis Khan also set the foundations for the formation of the largest empire that the world has seen until then, only to be surpassed in size by the British Empire few centuries later.
This Mongol ruler possessed many great qualities. He was very wise, excellent tactician, loved his people, was establishing peace on the conquered territories, encouraged people of ethnic and religious backgrounds to collaborate and coexist. It is very interesting that Genghis Khan can be seen bot as a nationalist and as a liberal, from modern perspective of course.
His nationalist tendencies are seen in the fact that he loved his country, he loved his people, and he made sure that every Mongol has all of the basic needs for life secured. On the other side, his liberalism can be seen in the fact that he had nothing against people of other ethnic, cultural, and religious backgrounds, but instead he was encouraging all people to put their differences aside, collaborate, and help each other for the benefit of everyone. All in all, Genghis Khan was an excellent leader, and a model as to how many other leaders should have been in that period of time.
Learn more about the Mongol Empire brainly.com/question/11288396
#learnwithBrainly
Whatchu mean? If you mean Slavery increased the economy and caused the Civil War, it's true.
The Seminoles were the tribe that crossed the Gulf of Mexico to get to the Indian territory. They were forced to cross both the Gulf of Mexico and the Mississippi river. They were considered as one of the five civilized tribes that had to move from the place where they originally settled. I hope the answer helps.
After following the instructions, these are my comments.
I doodle for a minute without thinking, following my instincts and feeling free to draw in any direction. Then I draw a square at the back of the paper
1. I compare the two activities in that they allow me to simply express my creativity by following my instinct.
2. What I felt when I was doodling and drawing figures was the following.
- It made me express myself like never before.
- I was not restricted to following strict instructions.
- I felt very creative to just draw what I wanted.
3. Between the two activities, what I think needs certain control or discipline:
- is when you have to heed instructions in order to get to a determined result.
Otherwise, it is very important to be free to be creative
I conclude that true expression comes from creativity, not from a set of instructions or restrictions.
Freely expressing yourself is a true mark of creativity.
Learn more about this topic here:
brainly.com/question/4121462?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
The Republican minority in Congress complained that the Sedition Act violated the First Amendment to the Constitution, which protected freedom of speech and freedom of the press. The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions were passed by the legislatures of their respective states in response to the Alien and Sedition Acts.
Explanation: