Both were a series of articles written under fake names to protect the writers. The viewpoint of the group, such as the federalists, who wanted a strong national government, and the antifederalists who were afraid of an imbalance of power, were presented and argued back and forth. People reading these publications had access to information that they would not have had otherwise, and therefore were influenced by the opinions of these two groups.
The American Revolution showed the benefit of home field advantage if you are willing to undertake atypical warfare.
In short, the revolution showed that the colonists knew the land that they were on, knew which locals supported them, and knew how to supply and get around the more professional British army.
Through the ruler/king/city-state leader. The Sumerian ruler had to show how he was divinely chosen for his ruling, so he oftentimes named himself the father of the country and had himself portrayed as the middle guy or messenger between the gods - they were polytheistic with Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, and others - and the people.
Answer: in my opinion, no, i think that if there was such hate going on, that the government would be forced to step in. The holocaust was pure hate and murder.
Explanation: opinion
He is Jacques-Louis David. He’s French painter and a close
friend of Jean-Paul Marat who was assassinated by Charlotte Corday with a knife
she had hidden in her clothing. He wanted to avenge the death of his friend.
Thus, his painting The Death of Marat has been put into creation.