Direct democracy would be extremely costly because people would have to vote on every single thing and this would cost time and money to ensure everyone has voted. It couldn't be resolved in early times, but maybe with the age of technology you could surpass that by having everyone vote online or something similar.
Hey there!
Here is your answer:
<u>The proper answer to this question is option A "</u><span><u>cross-dresser".</u>
Reason:
<u>A </u></span><u>cross-dresser is a term for men or women who do not alter</u>
<span><u>
their genitalia but who live as members of the opposite sex.</u>
Also....
<u>Its not option B because a transsexual is a person that would want medical assistance to change into the opposite gender that they are. Its not option C because a transgender is a person that was one gender than changed into the another gender. For example a boy-->girl. Its also not option D because a homosexual is a person that is sexual attracted to a another person of the same sex.</u>
Therefore the answer is A.
If you need anymore help feel free to ask me!
Hope this helps!
~Nonportrit</span>
Term used for a situation in which paired-choice voting by majority rule fails to produce a consistent ranking of society's preferences for public goods is the paradox of voting.
The paradox of voting, also known as Downs' paradox, states that the costs of voting usually outweigh the expected benefits for a rational, self-interested voter. Because the likelihood of exercising the pivotal vote is negligible in comparison to any reasonable estimate of the private individual benefits of the various possible outcomes, the expected benefits of voting outweigh the costs.
Responses to the paradox of voting have included the belief that voters vote to express their preference for a candidate rather than to influence the outcome of the election, that voters exercise some altruism, or that the paradox ignores the collateral benefits associated with voting that are not related to the resulting electoral outcome.
Learn more about paradox of voting here:
brainly.com/question/17136492
#SPJ4
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Aristophanes, in his time, had brought back some elements to the Greek drama. His characters used to speak like ordinary people, not as pompous gentlemen.
He used to write about some topics of Athens life, depicting them in a satirical way.
In his comedies, the plot is in the present, making a mockery of the government, religious greek issues: greek gods, and even the drama itself.
So in his comedies, there is political satire, parody, amusement and 'denouncing' by exposing to the ridicule and in addition to this, anti war sentiments.
Answer:
C. interracial background
Explanation:
The race of one's family and background does not affect one's behavior.
