Answer:
The only incorrect way could be to call it PN
Step-by-step explanation:
NOP shows the angle from NOP from two lines
O shows that is declaring angle O
PON is just the reverse of NOP.
However, on the other hand, PN is incorrect because first of all, that's how someone notate lines, and second of all, PN does not exist.
:)
6,000 is the value of 6 in 106,534
Answer:
0.9332
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: The correct option are B, C and D.
Explanation:
The law of sine states that,
Where A, B, C are interior angles of the triangle and a, b, c are sides opposite sides of these angles respectively as shown in below figure. Only AAS or SSA types problems can be solved by using Law of sine.
Since we need the combination of two sides and one angle or two angles and one side.
In option A, the two consecutive angles are known and a side which makes the second angle with base side is known, therefore the first angle is opposite to the given side, so the law of sine can be used for AAS problems.
Therefore, option A is incorrect.
In option B a side is known and two inclined angle on that line are known. But to use Law of sine we want the line and angle which in not inclined on that line, therefore the ASA problem can not be solved by Law of sine and the option B is correct.
In option C two sides and their inclined angle is known. But to use Law of sine we want the side and angle which in not inclined on that line, therefore the SAS problem can not be solved by Law of sine and the option C is correct.
In option D three sides are given but any angle is not given, therefore the SSS problem can not be solved by Law of sine and the option D is correct.
For starters, we know that the angle measures have to be similar or the same, since similar shapes always contain the same angle measures. We can use the way that the letters of each shape line up to identify which angle correspond to each other. Angle R should be congruent to angle W, but angle P is not congruent to N, it would be congruent to M though. Now we get to the tricky part, figuring out line segment lengths. Again using the letters in each shape, we can see that TK and NM do not correspond to each other, and thus cannot be congruent or similar. But, with RP/WM, this is correctly lined up with each other. TR/EW, same with this one, and TK/EN is also the same. With this Info, we can figure out the dilation of the smaller shape, or just figure out if they are similar or not. (So pick B. And D.)