Some ways that slaves resisted slavery was by rebelling, being less productive at work, stealing from their owners, and sometimes actually harming their owners (or just other white people). The slaves demonstrated a sense of semi-independence or self- worth through having their own subculture with their own unique music, having a religion and their own churches to tie them together, as well as celebrating their African roots and traditions. Slave masters allowed some of these behaviors so as to avoid their slaves becoming really aggressive towards them, as well as giving the slaves some "freedoms" encouraged and motivated slaves so they didn't get too hostile.
People need to believe they have equal social and political rights, else there would be mass protests, revolutions and anarchy. Whether they actually exist in real life is irrelevant here, only the belief matters.
The primary difference in the social structures of humans and animals is the forced imposition of order in human society, leading to a more 'collective' society, instead of the usual 'survival of the fittest/law of the jungle' structure.
And the concept of equal rights is necessary to achieve this imposition of order.
In my opinion, a human society following 'law of the jungle' would be unsustainable, simply because humans as a species are too weak to survive as individuals. The greatest strength of our species is our mental faculty. This leads to the sum of the parts being greater than the whole. As individuals though, we would fail to harness this strength.
Therefore, equal rights do offer us an evolutionary advantage, since they allow us to cluster together, and grow as a population, which is the only way for us to survive.
I think its Mexican Constitution of 1824.
Hello. You have not informed the text or the situation to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.
To answer this question accurately it would be necessary for you to read a text or know of a situation that brought some context to the question. However, a government can approach the increase in minority populations in two ways which are either by promoting factors that support that population or by trying to combat it.
Minority populations are socially disadvantaged populations, for this reason, it is important that governments seek to establish social policies that help this population to fit fairly into society. The larger the population, the more necessary these policies are. However, governments can try to fight these populations by creating elements that further disfavor them and promote their reduction, promoting unfair and prejudiced policies.
/////the Pacific Ocean./////
