One piece of evidence that Duara uses in the passage to support his claim regarding Western racial attitudes and Japanese militarism in the second paragraph is where he says that Japan was allotted a lower quota of ships than the British and Americans.
Or you can say...
Discrimination was perceived in the international conferences in Washington (1922), the London Naval Conference (1930), and wherever Japan was allotted a lower quota of ships than the British and Americans. But most of all, it was the buildup of exclusionary policies in the United States and the final Exclusion Laws prohibiting Japanese immigration in 1924 that galled Japanese nationalists. In their view, Asian civilization did not exhibit inhuman racist attitudes and policies of this kind, and for [Japanese] militants . . . these ingrained civilizational differences would have to be fought out in a final, righteous war of the East against the West.”
Answer: No it mean kind of stop simlare.
Explanation: it mean stop and wait just semiler like red.
"Many people believed they were convicted solely because they were anarchists" is the statement among the following choices given in the question that is true about <span>the Sacco-Vanzetti trial. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "A".</span>
Answer:
The Xanathar Guilds
Explanation:
Islamic World Started around the Seventh (7) century and still exist until today
The Mongol Empire existed between the 13th and 14th centuries in the eastern part of said.
Byzantium started around the period in 395 CE to 1453
Christendom started around the 11th century
While The Xanathar Guilds, though often considered as fiction or not real, was rumored to have started about a century ago.
Hence, the correct answer is The Xanathar Guilds
China has the biggest population in the world and they have been struggling to keep in under control for decades. The biggest way in which they have tried to slow down the population growth is by reducing childbearing. Back in the 70s, I believe they released a policy where people were only permitted one child per family. If families had more then one child they would be under fire. Now whether this violates human rights I would say most definitely.
