1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pashok25 [27]
3 years ago
6

What response is Roosevelt most likely trying to elicit from the American people in his "Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation"?

History
2 answers:
professor190 [17]3 years ago
8 0
The correct answer is C
soldier1979 [14.2K]3 years ago
8 0

Another answer is----- ("He is trying to create a feeling of horror over the events of the attack by Japan.")-APEX

You might be interested in
Which of the following describes the relationship between Nicolaus Copernicus and Galileo Galilei?
klasskru [66]
 C. Galileo provided observational evidence to support a theory originally created by Copernicus
4 0
3 years ago
what was the role of the Ohio River Valley in the grind conflict between the French Native Americans and British in the mid-1700
antoniya [11.8K]

With France's defeat in the French and Indian War, Great Britain acquired this territory. The American Indians in the Ohio Country took no formal part in the treaty negotiations.The conflicts that followed became known as the Ohio Indian Wars.

4 0
3 years ago
What mode(s) of transportation did Columbus use?
seraphim [82]
Ships....hope this helps!
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
10 POINTS
netineya [11]

Answer:

Judicial review is the power of the courts to declare that acts of the other branches of government are unconstitutional, and thus unenforceable. For example if Congress were to pass a law banning newspapers from printing information about certain political matters, courts would have the authority to rule that this law violates the First Amendment, and is therefore unconstitutional. State courts also have the power to strike down their own state’s laws based on the state or federal constitutions.

Today, we take judicial review for granted. In fact, it is one of the main characteristics of government in the United States. On an almost daily basis, court decisions come down from around the country striking down state and federal rules as being unconstitutional. Some of the topics of these laws in recent times include same sex marriage bans, voter identification laws, gun restrictions, government surveillance programs and restrictions on abortion.

Other countries have also gotten in on the concept of judicial review. A Romanian court recently ruled that a law granting immunity to lawmakers and banning certain types of speech against public officials was unconstitutional. Greek courts have ruled that certain wage cuts for public employees are unconstitutional. The legal system of the European Union specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review is also afforded to the courts of Canada, Japan, India and other countries. Clearly, the world trend is in favor of giving courts the power to review the acts of the other branches of government.

However, it was not always so. In fact, the idea that the courts have the power to strike down laws duly passed by the legislature is not much older than is the United States. In the civil law system, judges are seen as those who apply the law, with no power to create (or destroy) legal principles. In the (British) common law system, on which American law is based, judges are seen as sources of law, capable of creating new legal principles, and also capable of rejecting legal principles that are no longer valid. However, as Britain has no Constitution, the principle that a court could strike down a law as being unconstitutional was not relevant in Britain. Moreover, even to this day, Britain has an attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy. Therefore, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down legislation.

Explanation:

nationalparalegal.edu /JudicialReview.aspx

6 0
3 years ago
George Washington showed great leadership during the American Revolution
Rudiy27
He obviously didnt show great leadership just because of the year he was born or because he lived on Mt Vernon. "Washington led his army to a decisive victory at York town" would be a great way he showed leadership during the Revolution.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why were ancient greek communities isolated from each other
    6·1 answer
  • Help me! I can’t figure it out. It’s a civics question.
    11·1 answer
  • In Brown v. Board of Education, what problem did the plaintiffs have?
    5·1 answer
  • In 1948, western Berlin was a pro American island in a deceit sea
    13·1 answer
  • Defend why people follow Fascist leaders?
    5·1 answer
  • The costs of Standard Oil's business practices outweighed the benefits because the company had too much political power and was
    15·1 answer
  • Can colleges detect other apps during online testing
    7·1 answer
  • A citizen chooses to vote in an election: this is an example of which
    11·1 answer
  • Why was Abraham Lincoln such a controversial figure?
    15·2 answers
  • What is a key difference between the Earliest works of history, such as Homer's The Odyssey, and modern works of History?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!