This means that you have alot of love to offer, i would think. Another possibility would be that you have a lot of love to give, but not many take it? It depends on the rest of the poem, but the having a lot of love to give is a better answer.
Hope that helped :)
Answer:
According to this essay, the chain of events that are taking place is - Heat is causing death by heatstroke in young athletes and Thermometer pills are causing young athletes to be cautious. So the right chain of events would involve options B and C.
Explanation:
The essay starts addressing the issue that it is the internal heat or temperature of the body that shuts down the cooling system of the body at times causing a heat stroke and it is the young athletes who are at risk. They often don't understand the symptoms until it's too late. Then, it goes on to introduce a new product called thermometer pills which is a solution to this problem. Finally, a detail of how it works is given along with its only drawback that it is expensive. So the chain of events in this essay mainly comprises of the points mentioned under options B and C.
He and Adam.
Hope it helps.
Answer:
Let's discuss the meaning of these modifiers first.
A misplaced modifier, as the name suggests, is a word that modifies the wrong word, thus changing the meaning of the sentence (An old child's shirt was used to stop the bleeding - this would suggest that a shirt belonged to an old child, which is highly unlikely. Correct way to say this is A child's old shirt was used...)
A dangling modifier is a modifier that can not be logically connected to the word it modifies, most often because the word it modifies is left out of the sentence (When five years old, my mom remarried - it would be absurd if someone married, let alone remarried at the age of five. This modifier lacks the word it modifies: when I was five years old, my mom remarried).
We can conclude that the correct way to revise these sentences is to change a modifier's place (if misplaced) or add its modifying word (if dangling).
In our example, we see that the map was useless because someone (possibly the reader) was confused by its symbols. However, the confused reader is left out of this sentence, so it might seem as if the map was confused, which is highly illogical.
So, this is an example of a <em>dangling modifier</em> and the best way to revise this sentence is to add a missing modifying word.
"Since Jack was confused by the symbols, the map was useless" could be one of the correct revisions.
