S=d/t
for liam
4=.25/t
t=.25/4
t=0.0625hours
for harper
t=0.25/4.5=0.055hours
msg me if it helps
Answer:
up down down down
Step-by-step explanation:
due to the governments high spending the employment was down because the gov. couldn't afford to pay its workers, so many were laid off and also due to the spending wages were low, and the economy was down because of the little amount of buisness.
Answer:
The correct answer is B
Step-by-step explanation:
If we plug in x=10 to the equation, we get y=47
Since y is positive, A is not an counterexample
Since y is a function of x, C is not an counterexample
Since the graph of y is a parabola, D is not an counterexample
Hope this helped and mark as brainliest!
It is the graph where the two lines intersect, when they intersect there is a point where they connect, and that is your answer
Answer:
a
The estimate is 
b
Method B this is because the faulty breaks are less
Step-by-step explanation:
The number of microchips broken in method A is 
The number of faulty breaks of method A is 
The number of microchips broken in method B is 
The number of faulty breaks of method A is 
The proportion of the faulty breaks to the total breaks in method A is


The proportion of the faulty to the total breaks in method B is

For this estimation the standard error is

substituting values


The z-values of confidence coefficient of 0.95 from the z-table is

The difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is mathematically represented as
![K = [p_1 - p_2 ] \pm z_{0.95} * SE](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%20%3D%20%5Bp_1%20-%20p_2%20%5D%20%5Cpm%20z_%7B0.95%7D%20%2A%20SE)
substituting values
![K = [0.08 - 0.07 ] \pm 1.96 *0.0186](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%20%3D%20%5B0.08%20-%200.07%20%5D%20%5Cpm%201.96%20%2A0.0186)

The interval of the difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is
