Answer:
c. increasing; $62.5
Explanation:
The computation is shown below;
As we know that
Multiplier = 1 ÷ 1 - MPC
= 1 ÷ 1 - 0.75
= 1 ÷ 0.25
= 4
Now if the equilibrium GDP is $250 billion less than the expected level of GDP
So, the government spending would be increased by
= $250 billion ÷ 4
= $62.5
Hence, the correct option is c.
This question is incomplete, the complete question is;
We will derive a two-state put option value in this problem.
Data: S₀ = 106; X = 112; 1 + r = 1.12. The two possibilities for ST are 149 and 75.
The range of S is 74 while that of P is 37 across the two states. What is the hedge ratio of the put
Answer: the hedge ratio of the put H = - 1/2 ≈ - 0.5
Explanation:
Given that;
S₀ = 106, X = 112, 1 + r = 1.12
Us₀ = 149 ⇒ Pu = 0
ds₀ = 75 ⇒ Pd = 37
To find the Hedge ratio using the expression
H = Pu - Pd /Us₀ - ds₀
so we substitute
H = 0 - 37 / 149 - 75
H = - 37/ 74
H = - 1/2 ≈ - 0.5
Answer:
B. minus$2,000.
Explanation:
The computation of the economic profit is shown below:
As we know that
Economic profit = Total revenue - Explicit costs - Implicit costs
= $35,000 - $30,000 - $7,000
= -$2,000
The implicit cost is come from
= $70,000 ×10%
= $7,000
We simply applied the above formula so that the economic profit could come
Answer: PLEASE see below for answer
Explanation: An excludable good is referred to as a private good which restrict people from using them while a non excludable goods are public goods that do not place restriction an so people can access them eg park .
Also, Non-rivalrous goods are those goods that even though consumed by the people will not cause shortage of the availability of the same goods to others. A rivalrous good is the opposite as it causes shortage in availability to others when used.
National Defence----Non excludable and Non Rivalrous
Pay-Per-View cable television---Excludable and NonRivalrous
a Hot Pocket sandwich--- Excludable and Rivalrous
private classroom education--- Excludable and Rivalrous
pajamas--- Excludable and Rivalrous
a unicycle ---- Excludable and Rivalrous
Answer:
b. Will always be higher than the dividend paid per share
Explanation:
A firm pays dividend to it's stockholders based upon it's earnings.
Earnings per share (EPS) is expressed as:
= 
Dividend payout ratio on the other hand is expressed as:
= EPS (1 - b)
wherein, b = retention ratio which denotes the percentage of earnings retained by a firm i.e not distributed as dividends.
Thus, a firm's earnings per share would always be higher than the dividend paid by it per share.
