<span>King believed in interconnectedness across the US, he thought they should be willing to help each other because they are all a part of a bigger country. He also felt no one should feel as though they are an outsider when the live in the US, communities should be welcoming to all people. In order to achieve this, they would need to support each other and join up like a big family. I think this is a great concept because unity would make the country stronger and bring everyone together. America's purpose is to give people home for a great life, and we should be aiding each other in achieving that.</span>
Answer:
Small group
Explanation:
Small group discrimination is an intentional activity taken by the small groups to deliberately harm the minorities.
This segregation isn't upheld by existing standards or other controlling groups individuals in the prompt social or network setting.
Thus in relation to the question, a white student's small group on their without any one's support were able to pose the professor's office with racism depicting an instance of small group discrimination.
Answer:
On an inscription at the riverfront of the Rubicon River, was written, that soldiers, flags, or weapons are not allowed beyond the river
However, knowing that he would have suffered death if he went into Rome alone, and that by crossing the river, the legion and himself are sentenced to death (or could cause a coup) automatically, therefore, by leading about 5,000 men across the Rubicon, then he (and his legion) have cast the die, (their goal is not for Julius Caeser or them to be killed) and it will eventually rest with a side up, therefore, their cause of action has started (which is to go into Rome and preserve themselves) and even if they stop (stop the die) there is still an outcome (punishment/coup), and therefore, there is no going back
Explanation:
Answer:
Vicarious liability
Explanation:
Liability depends not on an individual's own misconduct but on that person's relationship with the wrongdoer. As per the common law of the United States, a participant of a conspiracy could be considered vicariously liable for the crimes that were committed by his co-conspirators in a case where the acts of the co-conspirators were intentional and performed in order to further the conspiracy's intent.
