You have the right to disagree with it because there is the fifth amendment that does not allow the government to take away your private property and replace it with recreational centers, etc. or parks. You can negotiate the price with finance and business but it might not be guaranteed, but with researching financials you can negotiate the price lower, hope this helps
YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO DECLINE OR DISAGREE THE PRICE OF EMINENT DOMAIN
Explanation:
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA), is a federal statute that provides RIT students with privacy and access rights relating to their education records. Generally, RIT students have the right to:
Inspect and review education records (with certain limited exceptions) within forty-five (45) days of the day RIT receives a student’s written request for access;
Request the amendment of education records if the student believes they are inaccurate;
Require RIT to obtain the student’s written consent before releasing personally identifiable information from the student’s education records unless an exception applies; and
File a complaint with the United States Department of Education’s Family Policy Compliance Office, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20202-4605.
This policy addresses RIT’s implementation of FERPA’s requirements and privacy protections. It incorporates the procedures found here FERPA Procedures.
Crime is a feature of all societies at all times. People who survive violent crime endure physical pain and suffering3 and may also experience mental distress and reduced quality of life. ... Crime rates vary by neighborhood characteristics. Low-income neighborhoods are more likely to be affected by crime and property crime than high-income neighborhoods.
Answer:
Um one example is water vapor, when it condensates it turn it liquid also known as water
Answer:
If this is a true or false question then the answer is false
there are many ways a trial can still be had; here is one example...
Explanation:
A murder conviction without a body is an instance of a person being convicted of murder despite the absence of the victim's body. Circumstantial and forensic evidence are prominent in such convictions. ... In all cases, unless otherwise noted, the remains of the victims were never recovered.
hope this helps :)
may I get brainliest please?