1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Illusion [34]
2 years ago
13

2. Joan is being released from jail on the condition that she enter a drug treatment program. She contacts Recovery Center to de

termine whether she is eligible for their program. They tell her she is not eligible, and she informs her Parole Officer of their decision and looks for services at other facilities. Her parole officer, then contacts Recovery Center and asks whether Joan has actually contacted them. Recovery Center informs Mark that she has. Is this a permissible disclosure?
Law
1 answer:
Oxana [17]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I would say yes.

Explanation:

People being released from jail are on a strict probation. Her parole officer is completely in the right to ask the recovery center if she has actually contacted them.

Some people being released may attempt to not do their conditions, so Mark was in the right.

Have a great day!

You might be interested in
Which characteristic is the only one not sanctioned as a probation condition to respect the rights of the individual being sanct
gregori [183]

Some conditions can be unreasonable and excessive this is not sanctioned as a probation condition to respect the rights of the individual being sanctioned.

What is probation?

Judges have a range of sentence options for offenders who are found guilty of the accusations and punishments. Usually, imprisonment is the most serious option (jail or prison).

Whether someone qualifies for a probation condition or not is determined by the law. For probation, a variety of criteria are taken into account, including prior convictions and the offender's attitude toward probation.

There are several probationary requirements, such as following all laws, maintaining or looking for job, attending school or receiving vocational training, volunteering, etc. It might, however, be excessive and unreasonable in some circumstances, which the judge ignores.

As a result, option (a) is correct some conditions can be unreasonable and excessive.

Learn more about on probation, here:

brainly.com/question/14036545?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
Which of the following would involve civil law, but not criminal law?
grin007 [14]
B would be your answer!
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
¿
Paraphin [41]

Answer:

necesitas

Explanation:

necesitas tú algo de la tienda?

me parece que es la respuesta indicada

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Thương lượng là một hình thức của?
Lisa [10]

Answer:

plss mark me brainliest I will tell the answer

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What arestand your ground laws
    5·2 answers
  • A victim of a robbery is describing the suspect to you. The victim tells you the robber was holding a “38 special” handgun. Expl
    5·1 answer
  • When do you have the right of way at an intersection
    10·2 answers
  • The work of private security personnel is analogous to law enforcement officers, which means: the work of both is exactly the sa
    14·1 answer
  • Who is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in thr State of California??​
    14·1 answer
  • What are the four items you identified that would be included in an Incident Action Plan? What is the first action you would tak
    6·1 answer
  • ¿El cumplimiento de mis derechos y deberes depende de m ? ¿Porqe?
    15·1 answer
  • Hi, Im BrainlyVisionBot! I've Been Installed By Head Admin! I Will Report Any Presumptuous and Inappropriate Behavior! I Would L
    6·2 answers
  • how do you back your car out To The right when you leave The parking lot where should you Turn your steering wheel
    5·1 answer
  • This law, which has since expired, banned the manufacturer of 19 semi-automatic guns and forbade the possession of firearms by a
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!