one con is that people who have a strong love and desire for guns will be angered and enraged because people will be creating laws or try to limit our use of guns. I know many people myself that love to use guns for sport or for the aesthetical value, and they are upset because people want to take that away from them. On some level I can agree that we need to control guns because of the outbreak of killings, and a family member of mine was a part of one of the recent shootings and thankfully, she is okay, but I too was angered by this. But I must keep in mind that not all people use guns to kill, because some just love the sport of it, but some do use it to kill. I think we should accept basic small guns like a handgun for sport, but if anyone ever asked for a bigger gun should be questioned because what person needs a gun so big? There SHOULD be a limit and I think only police should have big guns.
Answer:
A. It makes it clear that Twain recognizes the value of what Bixby taught him.
Explanation:
It is obvious that Twain recognizes the lesson from Bixby, when he says, "It was a good enough lesson, but learned the hard way." This means he obviously learned his lesson.
I believe that the best answer for this question is a counterargument. Whatever the writer is in support of is the argument. The opposite side would be whatever the opposing, or countering, argument is. For example, if someone is in support of free college, they would support their argument and perhaps include some information about the counterargument, which would be not supporting free college. Hope this helps.
The sentence with the correct subject-verb agreement is D. The staff get pizza and then eat together in the break room.
In this case the word staff is considered a plural because ever individual element is doing the same activity in the same place "together" but they are not actually performing the activity as an unit. They are side by side eating.
The other options are not correct because they don't follow teh subject verb agreement.
