Atsidi stood just outside his family’s hogan in the heat of the early morning air and looked out across the vast landscape of shrubs that peppered the flat land of the reservation. In the distance, red rocks with shaved tops stood at attention. Behind them, a range of mountains wandered across the horizon as far as the eye could see. "Atsidi looked for signs of movement; the horses and wagon wheels bearing his brother back home would signal their approach with clouds of dry, dusty, disturbed earth.
"
The bold sentence bears the answer. He is watching for his brother; he <em>wants to greet his brother.</em>
I think the answer may be C
One argument in support of pet cloning is that cloning "brings many pet owners joy." People who lose a beloved pet can clone the animal and feel that love again. While cloned animals are not the exact same as the original, clones do share some distinctive traits.
One argument against pet cloning is that cloning is unnatural. These people believe that cloning does not happen in nature, so people should not clone animals. The author of this article believes the positive aspects of cloning outweigh the negative ones.
Answer:
It would include information about the person, his/her name, place of residence, education, occupation, life and activities, as well as other important details. It is the story of the person, always written by someone else and never by the person about whom it is written.
Answer:
I believe your answer would be so the character can directly share his or her thoughts with the reader.
Explanation:
A is the only option that makes sense because choice B would be Third-Person omniscient, while C would most likely be either Third-Person omniscient or limited. Either way, First-Person shares the narrator's point of view, so the reader cannot know more than the character does.
<em>♥A.W.E.</em><u><em>S.W.A.N.</em></u><em>♥</em>
