Answer:
Creating further anxiety among the revolutionaries were a group of French nobles who ... the outbreak of another form of civil war, inextricably tied to revolutionary politics, ... tried "suspects" for treason and sentenced those it convicted to the guillotine.
Explanation:
827,000 Sq Miles know as the Louisiana Purchase in 1803.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
option c is the answer...
Answer: (this is gonna be a crazy answer)
Explanation: I think it was right to drop the bomb on Japan. The reason for this is because even though many people died, and the fact that most of their land had gotten destroyed, this helped them resolve their problem between the two. If it weren't for the bomb, they would have fought longer. And after that tragedy, this gave Americans and the Japanese to bond and help rebuild japan not only to protect them from other bombs, but to also make sure that no one else can take their land. Therefore, even though it may not have been the best decision, it was right to to drop the bomb on them.
(You don't have to agree with this this is just my opinion but hopefully you get an idea to form your own sentence if you can)
Roman society was one that constantly pushed romans to be more and more ambitious, to take more, do more and conquer more. Eventually you start stepping on people's toes who are trying to do the same thing, then you have two powerful people fighting for ultimate power (ceaser v. pompey, sulla v. marius, augustus v. marc anthony, etc.). Then there was the Marian reforms which made soldiers beholdened primarily to their general, not the state, for their rewards (usually land after the campaign was finished), couple that with legions frequently going further and further from Rome in the late republic, most Roman soldiers knew and depended on their general, and barely interacted with the state at all. So these generals gradually gained ferociously loyal armies that were closer to them than Rome in general, so they'd be pretty willing to fight for their general against another general, even when it would weaken the state as a whole. Obviously civil wars cause a huge amount of damage to their nation, both in lives and monetary cost. Plus usually whoever won the civil war would then proceed to kill all prominent citizens who even slightly leaned toward the opposing side. After two or three purges like this, many of the prominent families that made rome into a world power were completely in shambles and the bitter rivalries between them made future wars inevitable.
