What do the following is not a negative consequence of upward urban growth

Biology

2 answers:

Nina [5.8K]3 years ago

6 0

Increased use of surrounding land is not a negative consequence of upward urban growth.

oksian1 [2.3K]3 years ago

6 0

Increased use of surrounding land is not a negative consequence of urbanization.

Further Explanation:

Urban growth or urbanization is also referred to as urban sprawl. It means that the movement of people from the populated place such as cities and town to the low density or least occupied residential area. These lands are developed from the rural land. It is also described as the development of undeveloped area. The people move into these areas in order to find a more comfortable or better life.

Urbanization does have a number of negative consequences:

1. The urban development has change people thought about settling in a particular area. Now, they want to venture the other places.

2. It also increases the standard of living. The people now choose to travel more than usual.

3. The people now choose to live in an area which is less trafficked and calmer. It leads to the cutting of trees, poor infrastructure and loss of green cover.

Learn More:

1. Learn more about the effects of vigorous exercise on cardiorespiratory system brainly.com/question/1209683

2. Learn more about the structure of epithelium and connective tissue brainly.com/question/4557690

3. Learn more about the secondary function of the lymphatic system brainly.com/question/2909254

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: Biology

Chapter: Urbanization

Keywords:

Negative, urbanization, sprawl, populated, density, residential, rural, life, settling, standard, travel, trafficked, infrastructure, standard, travel.

You might be interested in

HELP PLS/ A large bottle with a layer of mud on the bottom is filled with pond water. Several fish and some green plants are the

motikmotik

Answer: C: Decomposers

Explanation: The mud and pond water likely contain some sort of decomposing bacteria. These bacteria can break down the complex nitrogen compounds in the dead fish, producing simple nitrogen compounds. These simple nitrogen compounds can then be used by the plants added to the terrarium.

A is wrong because producers (such as the green plants added to the terrarium) can not break down the complex nitrogen compounds in the fish's body.

B is wrong for a similar reason. Algae are primary producers. Because of this they also lack the ability to break down the complex nitrogen compounds found in the fish's body.

D is also wrong. A virus may be able to infect the fish and cause disease, but it lacks the ability to break down the complex nitrogen compounds found in the fish's dead body.

Since A, B, and D are wrong, along with the fact that we know that decomposers can break down the complex nitrogen compounds in the dead fish, we can conclude that C is the correct answer.

6 0

2 years ago

Contrast the flow materials in xylem and phloem

zimovet [89]

To easy remember it,
Phloem, has the (f) sound, so it carries food and nutrition like sugars all around the plant, up and down movwment.
while Xylem carries water and minerals, from down the soil up to the plant, only up movement.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

12) How do harvesting wood and surface mining for coal affect ecosystems?

Tems11 [23]

Answer:

Explanation:

because mining coal is not gonna affect eco system and coal mining is not good foy your body

6 0

3 years ago

Which statement accurately describes the relationship between cytokinesis and mitosis? Mitosis includes interphase and cytokines

Brilliant_brown [7]