Answer:
Hobbes believed a social contract was necessary to protect people from their own worst instincts. On the other hand, Locke believed a social contract was necessary to protect people's natural rights. Locke believed that if government did not protect people's rights, they could reject it.
Both mobilizations were important, but the industrial one seems to have greater weight, since this influences the population in general, and the military affected only where a conflict developed, it mobilized all available resources to obtain the highest military capacity in a specific area, but the industrial one had the capacity to produce what was necessary for war, as a fundamental and determining element in the outcome.
I believe the answer is:
- Pure mathematics
Proven by the difference in knowledge on astronomy between aztec culture and the Castillian.
- Urban architecture
Proven by the superior irrigation system that Aztec civilization had compared to Castilian civilization at that time.
Answer: 1,000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Explanation:
Answer:
<em>The KKK experienced a resurgence in the 1920s because of its strong ties with the political atmosphere of the 1920s, and its guise of protecting morals and its expanded vigilante justice services beyond the usual Anglo-Saxon Protestantism of blacks, Jews, Catholics and immigrants, etc, to those they now perceived as lawbreakers like illegal gin runners, unfaithful spouses, corrupt public office holders, etc. They also introduced paid "kleagles" which inspired membership by millions of people.</em>
Explanation:
<em>During the 1920s, KKK experienced a resurgence by blending of their extreme acts with common acts</em>. With this new methods of administration, they were able to get sponsorship and sympathy from the general white populace, and were no longer seen as masked extremists but rather as a community fraternity organisation. <em>To make them look like they were on the side of the law, the KKK got involved with local vigilante services, and prosecuted many bootleggers and corrupt politicians and even perceived cheating wives, inciting what would appear as a form of moral guidance</em>. However, with all these new reforms and methods, their lynching and persecution of minority groups still remained, and a series of feuds within its political circle led to its demise late in the 1920s
