<u>Question 1. </u>
Yes, Justice Murphy conceded that there were some people within the United States who acted with disloyalty toward the United States. In this case, the issue had to do with Japanese Americans on the West Coast. But in his Dissenting Opinion, Justin Murphy argued that the fact of disloyalty by some should not mean that all Americans of Japanese ancestry be subjected to restriction of their rights and evacuation orders. As he wrote, "Under our system of law individual guilt is the sole basis for deprivation of rights." Treating all Japanese Americans as if they were guilty of disloyalty to the United States was a violation of their constitutional rights and was a "legalization of racism," as Justice Murphy put it. All citizens of the United States must be treated "at all times as the heirs of the American experiment and as entitled to all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution."
<u>Question 2.</u>
I do agree with the Minority Opinion that racial prejudice played a role in the US government's treatment of Japanese Americans. The military was allowed to act outside of proper constitutional limits and infringed on the rights of citizens. There was definitely prejudice, which means pre-judging or judging in advance. The authorities were able to force any and all persons of Japanese ancestry into internment camps, without presenting any evidence that they as individuals had, in fact, done anything to warrant such action against them. It had been generic, stereotyped suspicion of anyone of Japanese heritage that prompted the government to restrict the civil liberties of Japanese Americans. President Roosevelt's Executive Order 9066 (February 1942), which allowed the Secretary of War to designate certain areas as military zones, set the stage for the mass relocation of Japanese-ancestry persons to internment camps. By June of 1942, over 100,000 Japanese Americans were sent to such internment camps. That was a rush to judgement against thousands of persons without due process of law, to which they were entitled under the US Constitution.
Yes. The United States declined to give aid to Hungarian patriots in 1849, and this was called isolationism. Isolationism is a policy that tries to refrain from any involvement with global affairs.
It prohibited colonial<span> settlement west of the Appalachian Mountain range
Hope this helps!</span>
Towards the years of 1504 and 1534 the first founding texts of America were published, which are written in Italian and Latin.
The articles of the confederation, which constituted the first document of the United States of America, is one of the four founding documents. These documents are safeguarded by the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage.
Since your question does not specify for which era, I will use the contemporary era for my answer.
Populism came back to the forefront of American politics during the 90s when Ross Perot ran for the US Presidency on a populist platform rejecting both parties and the Elite Establishment. It was a time of economic prosperity for some (tech workers, financial workers) and hardship for others (unskilled industrial workers) who lost their jobs due to globalization, when factories closed and moved to low-wages countries abroad.
During the Great Recession, Populism developed on both sides of the political spectrum. The left had the Occupy Movement and the right had the Tea Party movement and both shared a rejection of establishment elites. In the last presidential election, two Populist candidates were extremely popular, Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders. It can be argued that Trump, as a billionaire is not really a populist candidate but he did run on a Populist campaign, promising to “drain the swamp” (to remove corruption in Washington).
Since the 1980s, politicians have become increasingly technocratic, dismissing the views and opinions of the American people and deciding for them in very fundamental issues without even consulting them to confirm that their policies are supported by the majority. With the continuous economic and political crisis people of the left and the right are fed up with being ignored by politicians and want substantial participation in the decisional process of the federal and state government.