1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hichkok12 [17]
3 years ago
9

Which side tried to divide and conquer using conventional battle tactics?-during the revolutionary war

History
1 answer:
Svetllana [295]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: Colonists who supported the British cause in the American Revolution were Loyalists, often called Tories, or, occasionally, Royalists or King's Men. George Washington's winning side in the war called themselves "Patriots", and in this article Americans on the revolutionary side are called Patriots. For a detailed analysis of the psychology and social origins of the Loyalists, see Loyalist (American Revolution).

This article is an overview of some of the prominent Loyalist military units of the Revolution, and of the fighting they did for the British Crown.

Explanation: Engraving of the American Revolutionary War, depicting the death of British Major Patrick Ferguson, being shot from his horse on October 7, 1780, as he commanded Loyalist regulars and militia at the Battle of Kings Mountain, a Patriot military victory.

You might be interested in
What was the middle passage?
Kay [80]

Answer:

The Answer is A. The inhumane journey African slaves took across the Atlantic into the new world.

Explanation:

The inhumane journey was a middle passage African slaves took across the Atlantic into the new world.

7 0
3 years ago
The Supreme Court justices are more willing to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional than to strike down presidential action
TEA [102]
In general, you can look at the Supreme court checking congress (by overturning unconstitutional laws), congress checks the president (through investigation committees, and eventually potential impeachment) and the president checks the Supreme court (by appointing justices). There are some smaller checks that run counter to this order (like the President can veto congressional bills), but they're much more minor powers. Most of the time, the "checking" of presidential power by the supreme court happens by the court striking down laws passed through congress that the president has thrown a considerable amount of political weight behind (think many of FDR's new deal programs, some of which were struck down by the court. Obamacare also narrowly had some of it's components struck down by the court). The Supreme court can strike down executive orders that are unconstitutional. President Trump's muslim ban, for instance, had some of it's elements stricken down by the court in just the last month.
<span />
8 0
3 years ago
The outcome of the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison defined the constitutionality of the
sukhopar [10]

Answer:

B) Judiciary Act of 1789.

Explanation:

John Marshall ruled on this case as the Chief Justice. He first answered that Marbury had a right to his job because it had been signed and approved. The actual delivery was a custom, not a requirement. He then ruled that a writ of mandamus (a type of court order) was the correct way for Marbury to rule. Finally, he noted that the Judiciary Act of 1789 allowed the Supreme Court to make this kind of ruling.

<em>The next question was who could decide this issue. Marshall ruled that the Supreme Court could decide it because the Judiciary Act of 1789 said that they could. However, Marshall said that a section of the Judiciary Act was unconstitutional. That section allowed the Supreme Court to make a writ but the United States Constitution did not. Therefore, that section was unconstitutional and the Supreme Court could not make a writ for Marbury. </em>

Marshall looking over the Constitution and the statute is judicial review, a statement that the Supreme Court had an independent power to determine whether something was constitutional or not.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"which of these was the most conservative force in the ottoman empire in the early 1800s?"
jeyben [28]
What are the anwsers
8 0
3 years ago
If a German did not support the persecution of Jews but did not speak out to avoid getting in trouble, does that person share re
mrs_skeptik [129]

Answer:

I feel that they do not

Explanation:

think about the people who did speak out. they shared the same fate as the jews

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The does Paine predict will happen if Britain continues to rule America
    12·1 answer
  • The sources of powers reserved to the states are specifically outlined in
    13·2 answers
  • Martin Luther King, Jr. made a historical speech in 1963. Which describes the event? Select all that apply.
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following things were invented during the '70s? (SELECT ALL THAT APPLY)
    9·2 answers
  • Why did farmhands leave the countryside to establish their own farms or to work in factories?
    15·1 answer
  • Prompt
    13·1 answer
  • How did the idea of nonviolence effect Diane Nash's view of segregation?
    11·1 answer
  • What ya'll doin for Spring Breaks??
    14·2 answers
  • What are some current demographic trends in the United States? Check all that apply.
    15·1 answer
  • I DINDT MEAN TO DOT HIS SORRY
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!