Answer:
Start
A2
B2
B1
C1
C2
D2
D3
D4
C4
END
Step-by-step explanation:
Start (A3)
x is equal to 141 because they are alternate interior angles.
A2. x is equal to 39 because they are corresponding angles.
B2. x would be supplementary to 41 because the angle that x supplements is corresponding to 41.
41 + x = 180 due to the linear pair postulate. Therefore, x = 139.
B1. x would be supplementary to 82 because they are consecutive exterior angles.
82 + x = 180 due to the linear pair postulate. Therefore, x = 98.
C1. x = 102 due to the vertical angles theorem.
C2. x would be supplementary to 130 because the angle that x supplements is equal to 130 (Alternate Exterior Angles).
130 + x = 180, x = 50.
D2. x = 74, corresponding angles.
D3. x = 83, corresponding angles.
D4. x = 95, corresponding
C4. x is supplementary to 18 because of the consecutive interior angles theorem.
x = 162
END
Answer:
We conclude that the daily average revenue was actually $675.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that the current owner claims that over the past 5 years, the average daily revenue was $675 with a standard deviation of $75.
A sample of 30 days reveals a daily average revenue of $625.
<u><em>Let </em></u>
<u><em> = daily average revenue.</em></u>
So, Null Hypothesis, 
: = $675 {means that the daily average revenue was $675}
Alternate Hypothesis, 
: 
$675 {means that the daily average revenue was different from $675}
The test statistics that would be used here <u>One-sample z test statistics</u> as we know about the population standard deviation;
T.S. = 
~ N(0,1)
where, 
= sample daily average revenue = $625
= population standard deviation = $75
n = sample of days = 30
Since, we are given that we have decided not to reject the null hypothesis which leads us to the conclusion that the daily average revenue was actually $675.
What is the system? (Is there supposed to be an image?)
