<em>China’s growing global role and increasingly hardline policies at home and abroad gain attention, the United States and other Western governments are also taking notice of China’s expanding influence in developing countries. The implications of China’s growing investments linked to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), its ambitious global infrastructure and connectivity program, are increasingly debated. So, too, are the nature of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) efforts to popularize its authoritarian model and undermine developing democracies around the world, whether intentionally or indirectly.1 In November, Vice President Pence noted that the administration, through its Indo-Pacific strategy, intends to bolster the rule of law and human rights in regional countries facing growing influence from China.</em>
<em>hope</em><em> </em><em>this</em><em> </em><em>help</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>:</em><em>)</em>
The answer is:
The following options benefit African consumers but not African farmers.
I. Subsidies to keep crop prices low
IV. Availability of imported grains
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>If you were to subsidize to keep prices low, consumers would benefit exclusively because the would pay a fixed rate for their farm products. On the other hand farmers would be affected because we don't know many factors that would influence this decission. Some of these factors may be.</em>
<em>- Will there be a price fixed for certain products</em>
<em>- Will the grains be cash crops</em>
<em>- Will farmers be allowed to rotate crops</em>
<em>Without knowing these factors one can only assume that when you susidize a crop the conditions imposed on the farmers may or may not be ideal.</em>
<em>When it comes to the availability of imported grains, some of these grains may be even cheaper than local grains. This may have a negative effect on local farmers who cannot lower their prices at a loss. Consumers would definitely benefit by paying lower prices from imported crops.</em>
Answer:
President Ronald Reagan and Soviet Common Secretary Mikhail ... “In Reagan's see, Gorbachev was a communist, and might be ... “But they required to discover a way to overcome forty a long time of Cold War philosophy. ... a teacher of history emeritus specializing in U.S. outside relations at the College of Virginia.
Explanation:
Hope this helped
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
On May 16, 1868, US President Andrew Jhonson was elated after the US Senate had acquitted him during his impeachment trial. After the vote, 35 senators voted guilty and 19, not guilty on the 11th article on impeachment.
This made President Jhonson to me more confident that 10 days later, on May 26, 1868, the Senate would again favor him And so it was. The votes were identical. 35 senators voted guilty and 19, not guilty on the 2nd article of impeachment.
The reaction of the radical Republicans was one of anger for the decision made in Congress. Let's remember that Radical Republicans always had major differences with President Johnson in different areas, such as the way to order Reconstruction in the southern states.
