1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leona [35]
3 years ago
10

When do populations increase?

Biology
2 answers:
gogolik [260]3 years ago
4 0
Hey there!
the correct answer would be C when birth rights are higher then death rights.
this is correct because when there are more people being born and less dying there are more overall people.
hope this helped!
mash [69]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

c

Explanation:

i have seen this before and i got it correct i dont know if it works with you?

You might be interested in
Can somebody help me out
ozzi

Answer:

the answer is c

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Help me please- will mark brainliest
Sever21 [200]

Answer:

The scale is same.

Explanation:

The scale of nuclear fusion reaction on earth  is the same as compared to fusion reactions that is happening in the sun because both reactions produces the same product i. e. energy and heat etc and both are occurring naturally. Due to large size of the sun, huge number of nuclear fusion reactions occur ac compared to the earth which is smaller in size so the scale of both nuclear fusion reactions are the same but vary in numbers.

8 0
3 years ago
What are clouds made up of?
Oduvanchick [21]
Tiny droplets of water and ice crystals
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question: Using your understanding of the 4 macromolecules explain how Earth’s early atmosphere and the 4 molecules taught could
Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer:

Advanced forms of life existed on earth at least 3.55 billion years ago. In rocks of that age, fossilized imprints have been found of bacteria that look uncannily like cyanobacteria, the most highly evolved photosynthetic organisms present in the world today. Carbon deposits enriched in the lighter carbon-12 isotope over the heavier carbon-13 isotope-a sign of biological carbon assimilation-attest to an even older age. On the other hand, it is believed that our young planet, still in the throes of volcanic eruptions and battered by falling comets and asteroids, remained inhospitable to life for about half a billion years after its birth, together with the rest of the solar system, some 4.55 billion years ago. This leaves a window of perhaps 200-300 million years for the appearance of life on earth.

divine interventionThis duration was once considered too short for the emergence of something as complex as a living cell. Hence suggestions were made that germs of life may have come to earth from outer space with cometary dust or even, as proposed by Francis Crick of DNA double-helix fame, on a spaceship sent out by some distant civilization. No evidence in support of these proposals has yet been obtained. Meanwhile the reason for making them has largely disappeared. It is now generally agreed that if life arose spontaneously by natural processes-a necessary assumption if we wish to remain within the realm of science-it must have arisen fairly quickly, more in a matter of millennia or centuries, perhaps even less, than in millions of years. Even if life came from elsewhere, we would still have to account for its first development. Thus we might as well assume that life started on earth.

How this momentous event happened is still highly conjectural, though no longer purely speculative. The clues come from the earth, from outer space, from laboratory experiments, and, especially, from life itself. The history of life on earth is written in the cells and molecules of existing organisms. Thanks to the advances of cell biology, biochemistry and molecular biology, scientists are becoming increasingly adept at reading the text.

An important rule in this exercise is to reconstruct the earliest events in life's history without assuming they proceeded with the benefit of foresight. Every step must be accounted for in terms of antecedent and concomitant events. Each must stand on its own and cannot be viewed as a preparation for things to come. Any hint of teleology must be avoided.

3 0
3 years ago
3. Which of the following resembles a hypothesis?
Reil [10]

Answer:

Rodney claims that shooting stars burn from entering Earth's atmosphere.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Wendy sees a slanted telephone pole. This is an example of _____.
    12·2 answers
  • People playing basketball game in a gymnasium make up a closed system with 17,125 J of energy. At the beginning of the game, the
    10·2 answers
  • Was the creation of sandman a result of weathering or erosion? Explain your answer.
    15·1 answer
  • If the rabbit population increases, how will it affect the snake population?
    12·1 answer
  • Is chloroplast photosynthesis cellular respiration or both​
    11·1 answer
  • The start gun goes off to signal the beginning of the race. Before the runners can interpret the meaning of the noise, however,
    5·1 answer
  • Question 5 of 10
    14·1 answer
  • We know gender differences are based in biology because all cultures practice the same gender norms and ideologies.
    13·2 answers
  • It was field day at school. The sun was bright and the temperature high. Most of the students wore light colored T-shirts to sta
    13·1 answer
  • Evolution of a species acts on the of the species, not the .
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!