1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nuetrik [128]
2 years ago
7

why was there's so much controversy around the 2000 election how did the electoral college figure in this how does the selection

compare 2016 election
History
1 answer:
Mashutka [201]2 years ago
4 0

The hotly-contested battle for the presidency between George W. Bush and Al Gore was ultimately decided by the Supreme Court. It is “undemocratic;”
It permits the election of a candidate who does not win the most votes; and.
Its winner-takes-all approach cancels the votes of the losing candidates in each state.
You might be interested in
What was appeasement and how did that policy actually encourage aggression?
N76 [4]

Answer:

Appeasement in an international context is a diplomatic policy of making political or material concessions to an aggressive power in order to avoid conflict.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
What was controversial about Roosevelt’s 1937 Quarantine Speech?
katen-ka-za [31]
A Roosevelt hinted that the US could not always remain neutral......
3 0
3 years ago
In India, the people have resisted changing their<br> attitudes toward the caste system because
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

In India, the people have resisted changing their attitudes toward the caste system because the Hindu beliefs of karma and dharma reinforce the caste system.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Label the two leaders competing in the Cold War and their ultimate intentions.
Olin [163]
The United States and the Soviet Union were the two competing powers of the Cold War
8 0
2 years ago
How did the conflict in Israel and Palestine emerge from competing national movements?
Musya8 [376]
As the periodic bloodshed continues in the Middle East, the search for an equitable solution must come to grips with the root cause of the conflict. The conventional wisdom is that, even if both sides are at fault, the Palestinians are irrational “terrorists” who have no point of view worth listening to. Our position, however, is that the Palestinians have a real grievance: their homeland for over a thousand years was taken, without their consent and mostly by force, during the creation of the state of Israel. And all subsequent crimes — on both sides — inevitably follow from this original injustice.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What did Du Bois view as the key to " everything" <br> A.Suffrage<br> B.Freedom<br> C.Marriage
    13·2 answers
  • How many McDonald's are there in the whole world?
    10·2 answers
  • Federal government initiatives to prevent the future development of Dust Bowl conditions included the creation of shelterbelts,
    14·1 answer
  • 1. Give two examples of ways in which the television changed American life in the 1950s.
    6·2 answers
  • How did lincoln’s speech promote peace for both the north and the south?
    6·1 answer
  • Investigative personalities prefer to work with:<br> O things<br> o data<br> O people<br> o ideas
    6·1 answer
  • The Nile River originates in which of the following bodies of water?
    10·2 answers
  • Sourcing: Who wrote this secondary source and<br> when was it written
    15·2 answers
  • Believed that the structure of society is influenced by how it's economy is
    14·1 answer
  • WRITE HISTORY OF KOHINOOR DIAMOND IN BRIEF .​
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!