My favorite memory is when my father was completing his work Objective by Evaluating the Synthesis of chemical compounds and Modifying them, to create an experiment with Independent and Dependent variables. I had come into his office to work on English homework. I was working on Clauses. When I asked my Dad what he was mumbling about he said that the compounds were Indivisible, and that he needed to Eradicate one of the variables, and that the Eradication of one of the variables was Imperative to how well the experiment went. This is my favorite memory because we got to work together.
P.S you can use this as your own if you'd like.
Depends on what the excerpts are
The details from the passage which shows why <em>Andy wants to write a letter to be read at the game </em>are to:
- Satisfy the protesting players
- Shame the racist fans
According to the given question, we are asked to show which details from the passage which shows why <em>Andy wants to write a letter to be read at the game </em>
As a result of this, we can see that from the complete text, there is the issue of racism from the fans which led to protest from the players and Andy asks to write a letter at the end of the game so that he could satisfy the protesting players and <em>shame the racist fans</em>.
Read more about racism here:
brainly.com/question/19891893
Answer:The Answer is A
Explanation: I took the quiz
This question asks for an essay, which is a personal task that only you can complete. However, we are still able to provide some guidance that can help you complete your work.
In her "Letter to Napoleon III," Elizabeth Barrett Browning employs several rhetorical strategies to urge Napoleon III to forgive the author Victor Hugo and free him from his imprisonment.
Browning uses ethos when she presents herself as a fair person. Ethos refers to an appeal to credibility, and Browning employs it when she agrees with Napoleon about the wrong nature of Victor Hugo's actions. She also employs a paradox to force Napoleon to pay close attention to her argument. The paradox is that, even though Victor Hugo acted against the emperor, he deserves to be free. Browning employs anaphora when she repeats the phrase "what touches you" in order to convince Napoleon of the importance of his reputation. Finally, she uses pathos (an appeal to emotion) when she highlights how grateful and admiring Napoleon's subjects will be if he pardons Victor Hugo.