What does 'franchise' mean in the context of voting?

History

2 answers:

Alexandra [31]2 years ago

7 0

A is the right one .....

adoni [48]2 years ago

6 0

<h3>Answer: A) privilege to vote</h3>

You could also consider this the right to vote.

Often you may hear in the news the term "disenfranchisement", which means "taking away someone's right to vote". Another term for this is "voter suppression" or "voter disqualification". There may be valid reasons to do this such as the person has committed a crime and it is against the law for people of this nature to vote; though many would argue that this is unconstitutional.

Side note: The answer choice C is close, but voting is not an obligation. It's a choice.

You might be interested in

How were missions in Texas a success?

Lady bird [3.3K]

I would have no clue i don’t live in texas hint misiones equal 6

5 0

3 years ago

Before becoming a lawyer what was the brief career John Adams had after college? A. School Master B. Farmer C. Shoe Maker D. Doc

Daniel [21]

Answer:

At age 16, Adams earned a scholarship to attend Harvard University. After graduating in 1755, at age 20, Adams studied law in the office of James Putnam, a prominent lawyer, despite his father's wish for him to enter the ministry. In 1758, he earned a master's degree from Harvard and was admitted to the bar.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

What is not a way the korean war affects the US today?

creativ13 [48]

The Korean War was a short but blood war with more than five To Start This Course Today United States came to be involved and how the war affected Korea onset of the Korean War, not to mention the American soldiers found of September, North Korean forces had advanced all the way to the south.
hope this helps!!!!!!!!!!

3 0

3 years ago

What did gordie capitalize on in order to produce hit songs?

blsea [12.9K]

Gordy capitalized on the popular demand for girl bands or groups. Hope this answers your question! (I think we were talking about the African-American record producer, Berry Gordy, right?)

3 0

3 years ago

06. Some people argue that the Second and Third Amendments are not particularly relevant in today’s society. Do you agree? Why o

andrey2020 [161]

Answer: I agreed that the third amendment is not particularly relevant in today’s society, because we do not house soldiers in peoples houses anymore. The second amendment is relevant in today’s society, because it is used to protect yourself and hunt for food if needed.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers