In the "person-situation debate" amongst psychologists, Traits are a false notion. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be beneficial to examine how they respond differently in particular circumstances.
<h3>Which side of the person-situation argument did Mischel take?</h3>
In the psychological community's "person-situation argument," Walter Mischel played a significant role. Character traits are a myth. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be useful to examine the various responses in particular circumstances.
<h3>What exactly is the person-situation argument?</h3>
Nature versus. nurture argument in personality psychology concerns which factor, a person or an environment, is more crucial in predicting what people will do. There is too much variation in behavior across contexts for attributes to adequately describe individual variations.
Learn more about psychologists here:-
brainly.com/question/28321133
#SPJ4
<u>Answer:
</u>
Based on the given information, it can be said that India's government is a federal government.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The Constitution of India clearly enumerates the lists of subjects that the central and the state governments can exercise complete authority in. Thus, it can be said that the power has been distributed among the states and the center.
- Moreover, there is a concurrent list in which there are subjects that the central government and the state governments need to work on in coordination with each other. This makes sure that there is an established harmony between the central and the state governments.
I believe the answer is B. The police are legally required to enforce any state or federal law. The rest of the given options are totally legal.
Answer:
Americans in the Trenches Quick Check
Explanation:
1. B, D 2. C 3. B
