1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ryzh [129]
2 years ago
6

At the 2009 General Council, what was officially added as the fourth reason for being of the Assemblies of God?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Artist 52 [7]2 years ago
6 0

<u>Answer: </u>

The 'Coming King' was the doctrine that was officially added as the fourth reason for being of the Assemblies of God at the 2009 General Council.

<u>Explanation: </u>

  • The delegates of the Hot Spring Council first incorporated under the name of General Council of the Assemblies of God back in 1916. This was when the Assemblies of God were officially commenced.
  • The members of the Assemblies of God selected E. N. Bell as the first chairman of the Council shortly after the Assemblies of God commenced.
You might be interested in
Part 1: In Hinduism, what term refers to the state of "perfect peace"?<br><br> (subject is Religion)
kati45 [8]

Answer:

Nirvana

Explanation:

A state of perfect peace and release from the cycle of birth, death, and rebirth; state once enlightenment has been attained.

4 0
3 years ago
Write about the Pros of Indian Judiciary system (for a debate)? (urgent pls)
BartSMP [9]

Answer:

The collegium system must not see itself as being above the safeguards and measures for transparency, accountability and demographic representation that apply to India’s pillars of democracy.

In September 2019, Chief Justice of Madras High Court Vijaya Kamlesh Tahilramani resigned after the collegium upheld their decision to transfer her to the high court of Meghalaya (one of the smallest in the country). Justice Tahilramani was the senior-most high-court judge in the country. The members of the bar associations across Tamil Nadu protested against this move and carried “a one-day court boycott.” In addition, in Maharashtra's Latur, about 2,000 lawyers boycotted court proceedings to protest the transfer. The collegium responded by saying that they have “cogent reasons” for the transfer, and will reveal them if required.

At the heart of this controversy is the functioning of the collegium system, which makes decisions about appointments and transfers in the higher judiciary. In February 2020, former Supreme Court judge and member of the collegium from 2018–2019, Arjan Kumar Sikri, said that far from a “scientific study” about candidates, “most times, we [the collegium] go by “our impression” when appointing judges [to high courts and the Supreme Court].”

The collegium system is headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court. India’s Constitution originally stipulated that the judges of the Supreme Court and high courts would be appointed by the President based on a process of “consultation” with senior judges. The present collegium system emerged later based on three key rulings. In 1981, the “First Judges Case” ruled that the process of consultation with the CJI and other judges did not require a consensus about recommendations. Essentially, the ruling gave the central government “primacy in judicial appointments.” In 1993, the “Second Judges Case” overturned this decision and introduced the collegium system, arguing that “consultation” required “concurrence.” Specifically, the ruling said that the process of appointing judges would be based on “an institutional opinion formed in consultation with the two senior-most judges in the Supreme Court” and the CJI. In 1998, the “Third Judges Case” ruled that the collegium would be a five-member body, establishing the system that is most similar to the one currently being followed.

This reading list details how the current system can be reformed.

Opaque and Unaccountable System

C Raj Kumar writes that the lack of information about the appointment of judges, including the criteria based on which the judges make their choice, is “the most persuasive criticism of the collegium system.”

   Without a transparent process of the appointment of judges, the collegium system will not have the credibility and the legitimacy for it to be accepted by all stakeholders within the legal system. Transparency will not be established merely by stating that the members of the collegium will act in a transparent manner. It will have to be demonstrated by the process that the judiciary adopts in the selection of judges.

The lack of transparency and the absence of formal criteria have multiple worrying implications. Presently, there is no structured process to investigate if a judge who is recommended by the collegium has any conflict of interests. This is important in the context where the

   … collegium has been fraught with serious allegations of different types of alleged conflict of interest among the members of the collegium and the individuals they have selected to become judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court. There is an urgent need for the collegium to formulate a detailed set of rules and regulations that will govern the determination of conflict of interest among the members of the collegium who are involved in the selection of judges.

Social Background of Judges  

Alok Prasanna Kumar identifies that the collegium system prefers practising lawyers rather than appointing and promoting “judges of the subordinate judiciary,” which often comprises a diverse pool of candidates.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following best explains why most immigrants came to the unitd states between 1865 and 1920
puteri [66]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

many faced religious or political prosecution in their countries, and they fleed to the US to escape violence and war in their countries.

5 0
2 years ago
Pictures made from small pieces of colored glass or stone
VLD [36.1K]
Mosaics, mosaics are the answer
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Andrew has led a turbulent life. As a young child, he skipped school more often than he attended. When he did attend, he had fre
PIT_PIT [208]

Answer: Antisocial Personality Disorder

Explanation:

Antisocial Personality disorder (ASPD) is a mental health disorder that is characterised by disregard for other people.

People like Andrew with antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) may begin to show symptoms in childhood, but diagnoses is usually in adolescence or adulthood.

ASPD condition cannot be cured but treatment helps and it usually involves long talk with a therapist, therapy and support by the family.

It is usually chronic hence it can last for years or be lifelong

Those with antisocial personality disorder tend to lie a lot, break laws, act impulsively and lack regard for their own safety or the safety of others. These Symptoms may lessen with age.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Second bloodiest battle in the US?
    15·1 answer
  • Which situation best illustrates the constitutional principle of federalism?
    7·1 answer
  • Scott Peterson was convicted by a jury of murdering his wife and unborn son. Therefore, he must have actually committed these cr
    15·1 answer
  • Who are Louisiana Asian trading partners
    11·1 answer
  • A 6-year old male domestic short hair presents dyspneic with fluid dripping from both nares. The veterinarian suspects heart fai
    13·1 answer
  • How did the glorious revolution lead to a constitutional monarchy in england
    5·1 answer
  • You show respect for another person by:
    11·2 answers
  • How does technology contribute to achieving success in answering the second economic question ?
    5·1 answer
  • Help with the second picture please what the freak is a food web??????
    5·2 answers
  • This is the thesis to an essay: "A theme from both ‘Broken Chain' and ‘Fish Cheeks' is that you can always count on your family.
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!