1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alexus [3.1K]
3 years ago
8

If Is right will mark Brainiest! Please answer quick

History
1 answer:
PtichkaEL [24]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is A. The division ultimately weakened the empire and led to its decline.

Explanation

By the year 285 a. C. The emperor Diocletian decided to divide the Roman Empire into two halves. The eastern part would have its capital in the city of Byzantium (later Constantinople) from where it would be governed and the western part would continue to be governed from Rome. After this division the Roman Empire was weakened by internal causes such as the corruption of its rulers and the adoption of Christianity as the official religion; and external causes such as confrontations against Germanic tribes and the loss against the Barbarians in the East. Therefore, the correct answer is A. The division ultimately weakened the empire and led to its decline.

You might be interested in
A __________ is a member of a group represented by an elected official.
Dennis_Churaev [7]
A <span>constituent is </span>a member of a group represented by an elected official.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Einhard was a member of Charlemagne’s court and described him as “my lord and foster-father”. He also wrote that, “no man can wr
Maurinko [17]

Answer:SINCE I have taken upon myself to narrate the public and private life, and no small part of the deeds, of my lord and foster-father, the most lent and most justly renowned King Charles, I have condensed the matter into as brief a form as possible. I have been careful not to omit any facts that could come to my knowledge, but at the same time not to offend by a prolix style those minds that despise everything modern, if one can possibly avoid offending by a new work men who seem to despise also the masterpieces of antiquity, the works of most learned and luminous writers. Very many of them, l have no doubt, are men devoted to a life of literary leisure, who feel that the affairs of the present generation ought not to be passed by, and who do not consider everything done today as unworthy of mention and deserving to be given over to silence and oblivion , but are nevertheless seduced by lust of immortality to celebrate the glorious deeds of other times by some sort of composition rather than to deprive posterity of the mention of their own names by not writing at all.

Be this as it may, I see no reason why I should refrain from entering upon a task of this kind, since no man can write with more accuracy than I of events that took place about me, and of facts concerning which I had personal knowledge, ocular demonstration as the saying goes, and I have no means of ascertaining whether or not any one else has the subject in hand.

In any event, I would rather commit my story to writing, and hand it down to posterity in partnership with others, so to speak, than to suffer the most glorious life of this most excellent king, the greatest of all the princes of his day, and his illustrious deeds, hard for men of later times to imitate, to be wrapped in the darkness of oblivion.

But there are still other reasons, neither unwarrantable nor insufficient, in my opinion, that urge me to write on this subject, namely, the care that King Charles bestowed upon me in my childhood, and my constant friendship with himself and his children after I took up my abode at court. In this way he strongly endeared me to himself, and made me greatly his debtor as well in death as in life, so that were I unmindful of the benefits conferred upon me, to keep silence concerning the most glorious and illustrious deeds of a man who claims so much at my hands, and suffer his life to lack due eulogy and written memorial, as if he had never lived, I should deservedly appear ungrateful, and be so considered, albeit my powers are feeble, scanty, next to nothing indeed, and not at all adapted to write and set forth a life that would tax the eloquence of a Tully [note: Tully is Marcus Tullius Cicero].

I submit the book. It contains the history of a very great and distinguished man; but there is nothing in it to wonder at besides his deeds, except the fact that I, who am a barbarian, and very little versed in the Roman language, seem to suppose myself capable of writing gracefully and respectably in Latin, and to carry my presumption so far as to disdain the sentiment that Cicero is said in the first book of the Tusculan Disputations to have expressed when speaking of the Latin authors. His words are: "It is an outrageous abuse both of time and literature for a man to commit his thoughts to writing without having the ability either to arrange them or elucidate them, or attract readers by some charm of style." This dictum of the famous orator might have deterred me from writing if I had not made up my mind that it was better to risk the opinions of the world, and put my little talents for composition to the test, than to slight the memory of so great a man for the sake of sparing myself.

Explanation:

did report made 93.6 plz mark brainist

4 0
3 years ago
How many of the 50 states grant their citizens the power of recall?
geniusboy [140]

The correct answer is B) 18.

Eighteen of the 50 states grant their citizens the power of recall.

The power of recall in a state refers to the possibility in some states to remove an elected official from office when citizens deem appropriate through another vote before the end of that official term. Citizens have to sign a petition asking for the removal of the official for inappropriate conduct, corruptions acts or many other valid reasons.

8 0
3 years ago
Which phrase best completes the diagram?
dedylja [7]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Wat sparked the sepoy rebellion
Sveta_85 [38]

While there were a number of social, political, and economic causes for the Sepoy Rebellion, the spark that lit it off was an unfounded rumor that the new British issued cartridge for their Enfield rifles was loaded with cow and pig fat, which offended the repressed Hindu and Muslim minorities.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did China rebuild its empire after years of war?
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements about Alexander Hamilton’s political viewpoints is false ?
    11·2 answers
  • In 1821 , what was the problem mexican leaders had with texas
    9·1 answer
  • How does zinn describe the american revolution? 2. in what way was colonial military service unfair to poor common people? 3. ge
    5·1 answer
  • Write a one-sentence summary of how the textile industry in Great Britain changed throughout the 1700s.
    7·1 answer
  • After Leaving Spain in 1492 first sailed to ?
    11·1 answer
  • .The medieval era in Europe was a time when - о learning, trade, and the fine arts suffered. warriors were unable to find employ
    15·1 answer
  • Pulakeshin the second was the follower of who​
    7·1 answer
  • Which two rivers formed the borders of Mesopotamia?
    10·2 answers
  • Agriculture in Ethiopia​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!