Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The fairest and best way to choose a leader is dependent on the type of place a leader is needed. For example, some traits or attributes of a military leader is different from a business leader or sports team leader.
However, there are still general attributes, characteristics, or ways to consider as the fairest and best way to choose a leader. These are:
1. Consider the ability of the candidates to be a team player.
2. Consider their expertise or skills related to the position of leadership
3. Consider their competencies in carrying out their primary roles as a leader.
4. Rank the above as primary traits or characteristics to consider
5. Weigh their additional qualities such as the ability to influence others etc.
6. Select the one that ticks most, if not all the boxes.
Note that in a situation where it is about communities or groups of people outside business or technical related team, it should be based on Democracy.
1. Allies land on Normandy
2.Nazi forces surrender to the Allies in Paris
3. Allies move northward through France
4. Allies liberate Belgium and the Netherlands
Yes, i believe renaissance and the reformation should be considered radical.
Something can be considered as radical if it's<span> affecting the fundamental nature of something.
When renaissance and the reformation started to appear, it challenges the traditional method of making arts and replace it with the new one.</span>