how each of these "w"? im guessing it means work. and three weapons from then that are "new"? are:
Rifles. All nations used more than one type of firearm during the First World War. The rifles most commonly used by the major combatants were, among the Allies, the Lee-Enfield .303 (Britain and Commonwealth), Lebel and Berthier 8mm (France), Mannlicher–Carcano M1891, 6.5mm (Italy), Mosin–Nagant M1891 7.62 (Russia), and Springfield 1903 .30–06 (USA). The Central Powers employed Steyr–Mannlicher M95 (Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria), Mauser M98G 7.92mm (Germany), and Mauser M1877 7.65mm (Turkey). The American Springfield used a bolt-action design that so closely copied Mauser’s M1989 that the US Government had to pay a licensing fee to Mauser, a practice that continued until America entered the war.
Machine guns. Most machine guns of World War 1 were based on Hiram Maxim’s 1884 design. They had a sustained fire of 450–600 rounds per minute, allowing defenders to cut down attacking waves of enemy troops like a scythe cutting wheat. There was some speculation that the machine gun would completely replace the rifle. Contrary to popular belief, machine guns were not the most lethal weapon of the Great War. That dubious distinction goes to the artillery.
Flamethrowers. Reports of infantry using some sort of flame-throwing device can be found as far back as ancient China. During America’s Civil War some Southern newspapers claimed Abraham Lincoln had observed a test of such a weapon. But the first recorded use of hand-held flamethrowers in combat was on February 26, 1915, when the Germans deployed the weapon at Malancourt, near Verdun. Tanks carried on a man’s back used nitrogen pressure to spray fuel oil, which was ignited as it left the muzzle of a small, hand-directed pipe. Over the course of the war, Germany utilized 3,000 Flammenwerfer troops; over 650 flamethrower attacks were made. The British and French both developed flame-throwing weapons but did not make such extensive use of them.
there are many more, but here are 3 i found from a trustworthy source!
Answer:
the cost of ending inventory is $1,680
Explanation:
The computation of the cost of ending inventory is shown below:
But first determine the ending units
Ending inventory units is
= 30 units + 34 units + 61 units + 160 units -271 units
= 14 units
Now
The Cost of ending inventory is
= 14 units × $120
= $1,680
hence, the cost of ending inventory is $1,680
And, the same is to be considered
Sharon and two kids makes 3 people total with both kids being under 18, the poverty level from the table is $20,231
She gets $1000 a month for her kids. 1000 x 12 months = $12,000 per year
12,000 + her annual salary = 12,000 + 16,000 = $28,000 per year.
28,000 is greater than 20,231 so she is not living in poverty.
The answer is no
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": among the factors that are responsible for market risk.
Explanation:
Market risk is the threat of an investment value falling due to factors that affect all market-wide investments. Investors always take on a certain level of risk. There is always the risk that their investments do not achieve expected returns. The risk falls into two categories: <em>Systematic risk </em>and <em>Unsystematic Risk.
</em>
<em>Interest rates fluctuations, recession, and inflation are considered market risks.</em>
Answer: C. Increase
Explanation:
An oligopoly is a market structure in which a few firms dominate. When a market is shared between a few firms, it is said to be highly concentrated. Although only a few firms dominate, it is possible that many small firms may also operate in the market.
Where few firms dominate the equilibrium price will increase because the demand will be high, and this will make the equilibrium price increase.
