Answer:
7.71%
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the bond's nominal coupon interest rate
First step is to determine the PMT using Financial calculator
FV = $1,000
N= 25 × 2 = 50 periods ( semi-annual)
i/y=9.25/2=4.63
PV= - 850
PMT=?
Hence,
PMT=38.55
Second step is to calculate the Annual coupon Payment
Annual coupon Payment =38.55x2
Annual coupon Payement= 77.10
Now let determine the bond's nominal coupon interest rate using this formula
Nominal coupon rate= Annual coupon payment/par value
Let plug in the formula
Nominal coupon rate=77.10/1000
Nominal coupon rate=7.71%
Therefore the bond's nominal coupon interest rate is 7.71%
1. If Milo should try to sue Jess, the court will decide that
- that the parties had a contract, but the damages could not be ascertained because the hourly rate and number of hours had not been determined.
2. Yes, Sylvia will have to pay Sarah for painting the store, even though she did not verbally agree to the contract.
3. The store manager is most likely to explain to Arlene here that the advertisement is a valid offer, and the store must honor the price in the advertisement.
<h3>What is a business contract?</h3>
A contract can be referred to as business arrangements. They are very enforceable in the case of a breach by a court of law.
A business contract usually makes specifications concerning when a business would be done, the completion, and the payment for the goods and services rendered.
One has to fully understand the terms of a contract before they go ahead to sign documents.
Read more on contracts here: brainly.com/question/984979
<span>With respect to organizational change, this would also represent a change in the type of waste machines that are used in the Industry. Since the EPA is targeting a 30% reduction of waste generated by coal-fired powerplants, the manufacturing industries are now required to adapt the new method that is establish to minimize carbon footprint.</span>
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
The answer is Embargo
Can you give me brainliest? :D
