The main disadvantage of the valuation method is that the terminal value tends to dominate the total value in many cases.
In a free cash flow valuation, the intrinsic value equals present value of its free cash flow and thus, the net cash flow is left over for distribution to stockholders and debt-holders in each period.
- So, the disadvantage of the free cash flow valuation method is that the terminal value tends to dominate the total value in many cases.
Hence, the Option B is correct.
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/22593826</em>
Option A and C
In quasi-contract cases, the defendant received a benefit from the plaintiff. In promissory estoppel cases, the defendant made a promise that the plaintiff relied on.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
A quasi-contract is a retroactive system among two parties who own no prior commitments to one another. It is designed by an expert to change a situation in which one individual takes something at the value of the other. The plaintiff must have provided a substantial thing or service to the added party with the expectation or assumption that mortgage would be supplied.
Promissory estoppel is a concept in contract law that hinders a character from performing reverse on a commitment even if a legitimate contract does not endure.
Percentage, hope that helps
We can actually deduce here that the unintended consequences of an economic change that are not immediately identifiable but are felt only with time are known in economics as: D. Secondary effects.
<h3>What is unintended consequence?</h3>
Unintended consequence, as seen in social sciences are known to be the result or outcome that is gotten from a purposeful action which were not seen coming.
The options that complete the question are:
a. scarcity constraints.
b. marginal effects.
c. opportunity costs.
d. secondary effects
We can actually deduce here that such unintended consequences of an economic change that are not immediately identifiable but are felt only with time are known in economics are known to be secondary effects.
Learn more about unintended consequence on brainly.com/question/17228614
#SPJ1
It is true because a country that imports a tariff on shoes buyers of shoes in that country don’t do well so the answer would be True