Answer:
Probably A.
Explanation:
The Articles did not have separation of powers. It could possibly be B, because the constitution let the federal government tax whereas the the Articles would not also the articles let the states trade internationally, whereas the constitution gave the federal government the control over international trade. But I personally am leaning towards A.
1st one 3rd one and last one
The best describes the outcome of the Investiture Controversy is the monarchs lost the ability to appoint their own bishops.
The investiture controversy was a kind of Frankenteins' story. It is the conflict involving the monarchies of what would later be called the Holy Roman Empire
If the temple was a large one (as most in the "New Kingdom" were), the Pharoah in charge of said temple would have to employ many people to upkeep them. Not only that, but the larger temples also housed smaller buildings in its parameters. People were paid to run these temples, which also doubled as a sort of Commerce area. However, the temples focused more so on religion and beliefs.
The major downfall of the Articles of Confederation was simply weakness. The federal government, under the Articles, was too weak to enforce their laws and therefore had no power. The Continental Congress had borrowed money to fight the Revolutionary War and could not repay their debts.
