Answer:
Though slavery is now a widely unaccepted concept, the concept that a State's people should vote whether to be a Slave state or a Free state is still a vivid topic in most history classes.
The concept that a State's people should vote during the time of slavery meant that white men were only allowed to vote. Blacks nor women were allowed to. Along with that, state's believed that by giving men the right to vote whether state should be a Slave or a Free state would fall on the choices of those within the state and what they believed in. It fell under the concept or popular sovereignty, in which people of each state/territory would decided the fate of the State.
D because so much more people use it than all the others combined
The question is incomplete. The options are:
a. Quid pro quo
b. Two-party
c. unilateral
d. one-party
Answer:
b. Two-party
Explanation:
-Quid pro quo: is when a product or service is exchange for something that has value.
-Two-party: is an agreement that is made between two people.
-Unilateral: is an agreement in which a person promises something in exchange for an act made by another person.
One-party: is an agreement in which one party makes a promise and has the contractual obligation.
According to this, the answer is that this is an example of a two-party contract because John and Sue made an agreement to increase the amount of time they spend painting.
