Answer:
25.94%
Explanation:
Assume, Face value of bond =$1000
Purchase price of twenty year zero coupon bond = 1000/((1+i)^N)
. Where, yield = 5% =0.05
, N= number of years to maturity =20
==> Purchase Price = 1000/(1.05^20)
Purchase Price = 1000/2.65329770514
Purchase Price = $376.89
Selling Price after one year: 1000/(1+I)^19. Where i=yield=4%=0.04, N=19
Selling Price=1000/(1.04^19)
Selling Price = 1000/2.10684917599
Selling Price = $474.64
Rate of Return = (474.64/376.89) - 1
Rate of Return = 1.25935949481281 - 1
Rate of Return = 0.2594
Rate of Return = 25.94%
The transparency of a competitive advantage refers to the extent to which COMPETITORS CAN IDENTIFY THE REASONS FOR THE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE OF ANOTHER COMPANY.
The transparency refers to the speed at which other companies can identify and understand the relationship of resources and capabilities that is supporting a successful company strategy.
Answer:
The correct answer is option d.
Explanation:
An increase in the supply of a product will cause the supply curve to shift to the right. This rightward shift will cause the demand curve and supply curve to intersect at a lower price.
This will cause the quantity demanded of the product to increase and the price of the product to decrease.
A decrease in the supply will cause the quantity demanded to decrease and price to increase.
The effect of supply increase is indicated through the given figure.
Answer:
Steak is a normal good, and hamburger is an inferior good for Jennie
Explanation:
Based on this behavior, we can assume steak is a normal good, and hamburger is an inferior good for Jennie. That is because a normal good is any good who's demand increases when there is a rise in the consumers' income, while an inferior good sees decreased demand due to a rise in income. Therefore, since Jenna buys more (increased demand) steak and less (decreased demand) hamburger due to her increased income this means that steak is a normal good, and hamburger is an inferior good for Jennie
Answer:
$275,700 Decrease
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what The impact on Granfield's operating income for eliminating this business segment would be:
Using this formula
Impact on Operating income=Saving in Relevant fixed cost -Loss of Contribution Margin of backpack division
Let plug in the morning
Impact on Operating income=($530,000*40%)-($965,700-$478,000)
Impact on Operating income=$212,000-$487,700
Impact on Operating income=$275,700
Decrease in net Operating income
Therefore The impact on Granfield's operating income for eliminating this business segment would be:$275,700 Decrease
