All categories

3 years ago

Which is bigger 64 cm or 630 mm?

Mathematics

2 answers:

Alekssandra [29.7K]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

64 cm is equal to 640 mm. Therefore, 64 cm is greater than 630 mm by 10 mm.

Vlad1618 [11]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

64 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

What is the end behavior of f(x) = -0.5^2 + 2

NeX [460]

Answer:

f = $1.75\x$ /x

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's solve for f.

fx=−0.52+2

Step 1: Divide both sides by x.

1.75

4 0

2 years ago

Use the method of variation of parameters to find a particular solution of the given differential equation. Then check your answ

olga_2 [115]

Answer:

Therefore the complete primitive is

$y=c_1 e^{2y}+c_2e^{3t}+e^{t}$

Therefore the general solution is

$y=c_1e^{2t}+c_2e^{3t}+e^t$

Step-by-step explanation:

Given Differential equation is

$y''-5y'+6y=2e^t$

<h3>Method of variation of parameters:</h3>

Let $y=e^{mt}$ be a trial solution.

$y'= me^{mt}$

and $y''= m^2e^{mt}$

Then the auxiliary equation is

$m^2e^{mt}-5me^{mt}+6e^{mt}=0$

$\Rightarrow m^2-5m+6=0$

$\Rightarrow m^2 -3m -2m +6=0$

$\Rightarrow m(m -3) -2(m -3)=0$

$\Rightarrow (m-3)(m-2)=0$

$\Rightarrow m=2,3$

∴The complementary function is $C_1e^{2t}+C_2e^{3t}$

To find P.I

First we show that $e^{2t}$ and $e^{3t}$ are linearly independent solution.

Let $y_1=e^{2t}$ and $y_2= e^{3t}$

The Wronskian of $y_1$ and $y_2$ is $\left|\begin{array}{cc}y_1&y_2\\y'_1&y'_2\end{array}\right|$

$=\left|\begin{array}{cc}e^{2t}&e^{3t}\\2e^{2t}&3e^{3t}\end{array}\right|$

$=e^{2t}.3e^{3t}-e^{2t}.2e^{3t}$

$=e^{5t}$ ≠ 0

∴ $y_1$ and $y_2$ are linearly independent.

Let the particular solution is

$y_p=v_1(t)e^{2t}+v_2(t)e^{3t}$

Then,

$Dy_p= 2v_1(t)e^{2t}+v'_1(t)e^{2t}+3v_2(t)e^{3t}+v'_2(t)e^{3t}$

Choose $v_1(t)$ and $v_2(t)$ such that

$v'_1(t)e^{2t}+v'_2(t)e^{3t}=0$ .......(1)

So that

$Dy_p= 2v_1(t)e^{2t}+3v_2(t)e^{3t}$

$D^2y_p= 4v_1(t)e^{2t}+9v_2(t)e^{3t}+ 2v'_1(t)e^{2t}+3v'_2(t)e^{3t}$

Now

$4v_1(t)e^{2t}+9v_2(t)e^{3t}+ 2v'_1(t)e^{2t}+3v'_2(t)e^{3t}-5[2v_1(t)e^{2t}+3v_2(t)e^{3t}] +6[v_1e^{2t}+v_2e^{3t}]=2e^t$

$\Rightarrow 2v'_1(t)e^{2t}+3v'_2(t)e^{3t}=2e^t$ .......(2)

Solving (1) and (2) we get

$v'_2=2 e^{-2t}$ and $v'_1(t)=-2e^{-t}$

Hence

$v_1(t)=\int (-2e^{-t}) dt=2e^{-t}$

and $v_2=\int 2e^{-2t}dt =-e^{-2t}$

Therefore $y_p=(2e^{-t}) e^{2t}-e^{-2t}.e^{3t}$

$=2e^t-e^t$

$=e^t$

Therefore the complete primitive is

$y=c_1 e^{2y}+c_2e^{3t}+ e^{t}$

<h3>Undermined coefficients:</h3>

∴The complementary function is $C_1e^{2t}+C_2e^{3t}$

The particular solution is $y_p=Ae^t$

Then,

$Dy_p= Ae^t$ and $D^2y_p=Ae^t$

$\therefore Ae^t-5Ae^t+6Ae^t=2e^t$

$\Rightarrow 2Ae^t=2e^t$

$\Rightarrow A=1$

$\therefore y_p=e^t$

Therefore the general solution is

$y=c_1e^{2t}+c_2e^{3t}+e^t$

4 0

3 years ago

What’s the answer to this problem

snow_tiger [21]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

It’s not real

6 0

3 years ago

What two whole numbers is the quotient between?

Katarina [22]

Answer:

Choice D

Step-by-step explanation:

38/4 =9.5

Therefore, this number is between 9 and 10

Note:

38/4 = 9 remainder 2

Hence, the quotient is 9 which is a whole number

3 0

3 years ago

2[18-(5+9)÷7]<br>show how you did it

Alex777 [14]

Order of operations

PEMDAS
do parntheases
then exponents
then mutiply or divide, whichever coms first
then addd or subtract, whichever comes first

so

when doing parenthases, simplify innermost parenthsees first

so

2(18-(5+9)/7)
innermost is (5+9)=14

now we gots
2(18-(14)/7)
we can distribute or multiply the invisible -1 in front of the 14

2(18-14/7)
now divide because division comes before adition
remember that it is -14/7, not just 14/7 because the negative is part of the 14

2(18-2)

now simplify parenthasees
18-2=16
so

2(16)
multiply
32

the result is 32

5 0

4 years ago