Answer: (B) Systematic, Unsystematic
Explanation:
The systematic risk is one of the type of investment and it is measured by investment return covariance in the market. The systematic risk is basically divided by market risk once it is calculated.
The premium risk of the security is mainly determine by the systematic risk and it is not depend upon its unsystematic risk.
The unsystematic risks is basically inherited from the specific industry and the risk can be reduced by the diversification.
Therefore, Option (B) is correct.
Answer:
d. $25,050.
Explanation:
The computation of the acquisition cost is shown below:
= Cash price of equipment + sales tax + Insurance during transit + Installation and testing
= $22,500 + $1,800 + $320 + $430
= $25,050
To find out the acquisition cost, we have to consider all that cost which is related to the purchase of equipment. Since, all the costs are related, so we have to take all costs which are mentioned in the question.
The expectation of the Tatum Manufacturing firm from the Hong Kong government is to <u>ensure fair competition </u>with its competitors.
<h3>What is a manufacturing firm?</h3>
A manufacturing firm is a firm that engages in massive scale production of goods and commodities that uses physical labor and/or machinery to turn raw materials and parts, into finished goods or completed items.
The finished goods could be sold:
- To other manufacturers for the fabrication of more sophisticated products,
- To wholesalers that redistribute the goods to retail traders, or
- To final consumers directly.
The role of the Hong Kong government to Tatum Manufacturing Firm in as much they comply with the government regulations and taxes is for the government to ensure that there is fair competition for Tatum Firm with its competitors.
Learn more about a manufacturing firm here:
brainly.com/question/24519299
Answer: D. The actual value of the contract is less than $30 million for each year he plays.
Explanation:
Given that Mark sherzer will be paid $15 million per year for 14 years reflects a contract whose value at the time of signing is ($15 million × 14) = $210 million. However, the payment would not be paid at the of signing but spread over a period of 14 years with $15 million being splashed out annually. However, considering the time value of money, whereby the present value of a fixed amount decreases with time. Hence in actual sense, the $210 million face worth of the contract will actually be less than $30 million [$210/7(playing years)] as time progresses on the fixed amount paid yearly due to reduction in the value of the present value as time progresses.
Answer:
1. Available to finance expenditure of the current period
Explanation:
Government Accounting is concerned with propriety i.e judicious use of resources and allocation of government funds so as to ensure efficient performance of government entities.
Efficiency refers to input/output ratio whereas effectiveness refers to achievement of government programs.
Government requires funds for allocation to various projects which require sanctioning by an authority.
In the same context, the concept of "available" refers to the availability of funds to meet the current period expenditure and liabilities.