Answer:
Option (D) is correct.
Explanation:
Calculation of total manufacturing overhead:-
4000 units manufacturing overhead:
= Production volume × Manufacturing overhead
= 4,000 × $94
= $376,000
5000 units manufacturing overhead:
= Production volume × Manufacturing overhead
= 5,000 × $77.60
= $388,000
Variable cost per unit:
= 12
Fixed cost = Total cost - variable cost
= $388,000 - 5,000 × 12
= $388,000 - $60,000
= $328,000
So total monthly fixed manufacturing cost is $328,000.
Answer: D. All of the above
Explanation: The three options listed could explain why the productivity of labor increased with a reduction in the quantity of labor hired. The law of diminishing returns states that as more and more inputs of production are added, a time comes in when additional inputs causes no corresponding increase in productivity. At points like this a reduction in the input added would restore productivity.
Reducing the amount of labor obviously is a labour saving technical change. Changes in organizational innovation can also result in changes in productivity.
Answer: c. Risky assets into safer assets
Explanation:
The process of asset transformation refers to the conversion of risky assets into safer assets. Asset transformationa is simply a form of transformation in which financial institutions like banks use deposits in the generation of revenue through the pooling deposits in order to make loans. It has to do with transforming bank liabilities into bank assets.
Your answer is true! The root of the word "retention" is retain, so basically customer retention means retaining customers, which also means having them return. Hope I helped!
Answer:
No, we can’t say
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to decide if we can say that Guatemala’s standard of living grew more than that of the US’ standard of living between the years 1993 and 2003 given the pointers in the question.
We cannot say that this is correct because of the following reasons;
As observed from the question, the US growth rate was calculated between the years 1948-2003, which is indicative of a 55 year span. Now, comparing this with that of Guatemala, we can see that the span here is just 10 years I.e from 1993 to 2003.
Also, we were not provided with the population growth rate in both countries and this makes it difficult to judge which of the two countries have a better growth in terms of standard of living
