Answer: 1. a. The existence of a no-fault law.
2. d. $17,000
Explanation:
1. For Jane to prove that Famous was indeed negligent, she definitely does not need the No - Fault law. This is a law that is mostly applicable to motor vehicle accidents and means that the individual parties are responsible for whatever injuries they sustain and the person who actually caused the accident is irrelevant. The main aim of this is to reduce the damages claims that one can be put on Insurance which increase insurance premiums.
<em>If this law was to be applied here, Jane would</em> <em>be responsible for her own injuries and her suit would fail. </em>
2. Jane missed 2 weeks of work and in each week she earns $5,000.
She also had medical expenses of $4,000 and estimated pain and suffering of $3,000.
The general damages therefore are the two weeks she missed plus the medical expenses and the pain and suffering.
= 5,000 ( 2) + 4,000 + 3,000
= 10,000 + 7,000
= $17,000
Answer:
I think it's make decisions
Explanation:
"CRM is a set of methods that companies use to <em>understand </em>customers. These methods <em>make decisions</em> regarding the selected customer segments"
Answer:
Acceleration, a = 28m/s²
Explanation:
Given the following data;
Initial velocity, u= 150m/s
Final velocity, v = 10m/s
Time, t = 5secs
To find the acceleration;
Acceleration, a = (v-u)/t
Substituting into the equation, we have;
Acceleration, a = (150-10)/5
Acceleration, a = 140/5
Acceleration, a = 28m/s²
Therefore, the acceleration of the drag racer is 28m/s².
Answer:
The boy: 8 years old
The sister: 11 years old
Explanation:
We assume that the age at present of the boy is x (years old).
As he is younger than his sister 3 years, so that his sister's present age is great than x 3 years
=> Her present age is: x + 3 (years old)
Two years ago, the boy is younger than present two years
=> The boy's age two years ago is: x - 2 (years old)
Similarly, the sister's age two years ago is: (x+3)-2 = x + 1 (years old)
As given, two years ago he was two-thirds of his sister's age, so that we have:
<em>The boy's age two years ago = </em>
<em> × the sister's age two years ago</em>
⇒ 
⇒ 
⇒ 
⇒ 
⇒ 
=> x + 3 = 8 + 3 = 11
So the present age of the boy is 8 years old, of the sister is 11 years old
Answer:
C) Rudy's Hot Dogs will be liable to Roger if he makes any discrimination or wrongful discharge claims.
Explanation:
Option A is wrong: Roger is not an employee of Rudy's Hot Dogs, he is an independent contractor, therefore Rudy's Hot Dogs does not need to withhold any part of his wage for federal income tax purposes. As an independent contractor, Roger is responsible for paying his own taxes.
Option B is wrong: Roger can be hold liable for any torts committed by him within the scope of the working relationship with Rudy's Hot Dogs.
