Answer:
The variable is usually the unknown part of the whole.
Consider the contrapositive of the statement you want to prove.
The contrapositive of the logical statement
<em>p</em> ⇒ <em>q</em>
is
¬<em>q</em> ⇒ ¬<em>p</em>
In this case, the contrapositive claims that
"If there are no scalars <em>α</em> and <em>β</em> such that <em>c</em> = <em>α</em><em>a</em> + <em>β</em><em>b</em>, then <em>a₁b₂</em> - <em>a₂b₁</em> = 0."
The first equation is captured by a system of linear equations,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0547f/0547f60f732c0b03b038502ec48a011c4b433b45" alt="\begin{cases}c_1 = \alpha a_1 + \beta b_1\\ c_2 = \alpha a_2 + \beta b_2\end{cases}"
or in matrix form,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40399/40399771827b73dcee0b88925a95f666b2266ce0" alt="\begin{pmatrix}c_1\\c_2\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}a_1&b_1\\a_2&b_2\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}\alpha\\\beta\end{pmatrix}"
If this system has no solution, then the coefficient matrix on the right side must be singular and its determinant would be
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b5d0/3b5d0668ae382d61828bc663707fe53b79b74408" alt="\begin{vmatrix}a_1&b_1\\a_2&b_2\end{vmatrix} = a_1b_2-a_2b_1 = 0"
and this is what we wanted to prove. QED
Answer:
iiiii
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: The y-intercept would be 10
Step-by-step explanation:
(-2, 15), (1, 6), (2, 3), (4, -3), (7, -12) are the coordinate points, you can graph it to find the intercept. I used the graphing calculator desmos.