Executives turn to WHITEPAPERS prepared by potential b2b marketers to confront an unfulfilled business need.
- The whitepapers contain useful information that will guide the executives to realize the business needs to fulfill for potential customers.
- The whitepapers are usually issued by the potential customer organization as a way of advocating clearly its position on a specified business problem.
- The whitepapers provide the executives the guide they require to understand and solve business needs.
Thus, executives should turn to whitepapers prepared by potential b2b marketers to solve unfulfilled business needs.
Read more about the importance of market research at brainly.com/question/12435635
Answer:
Portfolio management depends on strategic planning
Explanation:
While strategic planning in the analysis of both internal and external factors that will guide towards implementing an effective business strategies using models like SWOT and ,PESTLE analysis and Porters five forces, portfolio management is the management of a particular investment.
Before one can improve on a plan , there must be an existing plan. This means that there must be a functioning operation before one can begin to talk of improving on a particular portfolio
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
When an intoxicated person enters into a contract, the contract can either be enforceable, meaning held to the fullest extent of the law, or voidable by the intoxicated person. The court will look at two criteria that need to be present in order to make the contract voidable:
-
The intoxication was severe enough that the person entering into the contract was incapacitated.
-
The other party was aware of the intoxication at the time.
A voidable contract, in this instance, is one in which the intoxicated party can end the agreement under certain terms. To expand on the criteria above, in order for the intoxicated person to void the contract, there needs to be adequate proof that one of the following occurred:
-
The intoxicated person consumed enough alcohol or drugs to cause impairment in thinking sufficient enough that he could not understand the legal ramifications of entering into the contract.
-
The other party to the contract knew of the intoxication.
