Answer:
I believe the evidence indicates the following environment:
This is a desert because there is little precipitation for plant and animal life to thrive.
Explanation:
According to the evidence, this environment is scarce in plant and animal life. Among the options given, the best ones would be tundra and desert. However, <u>the option concerning the tundra has a crucial mistake that makes it incorrect. </u>
<u>According to it, a tundra "is too hot for plant and animal to live in." However, a tundra is is an extremely cold biome consisting of snow-covered lands.</u> The tundra is, in other words, like a cold desert. <u>Both environments have little precipitation, which makes it harder for plant and animal life to thrive. </u>
<u>Since that option makes such a mistake, we can easily choose the one about the desert as the correct one: </u><u>This is a desert because there is little precipitation for plant and animal life to thrive.</u>
It is characterized primarily by a paradox. A paradox is a statement or proposition that notwithstanding sound or apparently sound reasoning from acceptable premises that mains to a conclusion that appears pointless, logically intolerable or self-contradicting or seemingly absurd or self-contradictory statement or offer that when examined or clarified may prove to be well instituted or true.
Answer:
(b) no, because the promise was illusory
Explanation:
Answer:
A price floor set above the market equilibrium price has several side-effects. Consumers find they must now pay a higher price for the same product. As a result, they reduce their purchases or drop out of the market entirely. Meanwhile, suppliers find they are guaranteed a new, higher price than they were charging before.
Explanation:
