Given inequality -3(4-6x) < x+5.
We have -3 in front of Parenthesis.
That represents multiplication of -3 and Parenthesis.
The multiplication of Parenthesis could be done by applying distributive property.
On distributing, we get
-12+18x < x+5
x is added on right side of the inequality. The reverse operation of addition is subtraction. So we need to subtract x from both sides, we get
-12+18x-x < x-x+5
-12+17x < 5
Now, we need to get rid -12 from left side.
So, we need to apply addition property of equality, we need to add 12 on both sides, we get
-12+12+18x < x+5+12
17x < 17
We need to get rid 17 from left side. So we need to apply division property of equality.
On dividing both sides by 17, we get
17x/17 < 17/17
x<1.
(a) The product of
is calculated to be 
(b)The product of
is not equal to the product of 
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
<u>(a)</u>

b)

The product of
is not equal to the product of 
The greatest common factor is 2
This is because we start by taking the largest factor that goes into both coefficients. Since the first coefficient is 2, we have to try 2 and 1. Since 2 is larger and goes into 36 evenly, we use that.
Then we use the smallest number of each variable. There are 4 r's in both equations. So, that is the number that we take. There are 2 s's in the first term, so we take that number.
Answer:
2.25
Step-by-step explanation:
because you have to divide 32 by 14 2/9 resulting in the the 14 2/9 to be 128/9 and then flipped, 9/128. Afterwards, cross out the the 32 and 128 since 32 is a factor of 128 to get 1 and 4.Then apply mutiplication 1/1 * 9/4= 9/4 or 2 1/4= 2.25
There are an infinite number of them.
Here are a few:
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.3000000001
2.30000000000000006
2.5
2.00009
.
.
etc.
How to find them:
You probably never heard this before, but I'll bet
you'll remember it from now on:
<em>ANY number that you can write down on paper completely, </em><em>using digits
and a decimal point if you need it but no symbols, is a rational number.</em>
If you can write it down completely without any 'comments', then it's rational.