Answer:
Yes, because although we like to imagine that our beliefs are rational, logical, and objective, the fact is that our ideas are often based on paying attention to the information that upholds our ideas and ignoring the information that challenges our existing beliefs.
If we are to match the terms of the following logical fallacies with its definition, it would be:
A) The use of popular mass appeal to convince others that they should do/believe something because everyone else does/is
Bandwagon
B) The use of an extreme example that is highly unlikely to try to discredit the action or words of another
Strawman
C) The use of finger-pointing or name-calling to attack the person making the argument instead of the argument itself
Ad Hominem
D) The use of an argument's conclusion as a premise for proving the argument (assuming what it is attempting to prove)
Circular reasoning
E) A conclusion or reply that does not follow the previous statement in a logical manner
Non sequitur
F) The use of quick judgment that is not based on facts but instead on a very limited experience to what one is judging
Hasty generalization
<h3>What is Hasty Generalization?</h3>
This refers to the type of fallacy that is used when a person rushes into a hasty conclusion about a thing from incomplete facts, which is usually incorrect.
Hence, we can see that the correct matchings has been made above.
Read more about hasty generalization here:
brainly.com/question/2955537
#SPJ1
the answer would be ethos hope this help
