Answer:
hi how are you
The Missouri River would have flowed north across Canada. There would be no Hudson’s Bay. The Ohio River would not exist. Instead the “New” River of West Virginia would have flowed north to the St. Lawrence. There would be no Great Lakes.
The British colonies would have remained hemmed in along the Atlantic. There would be no easy access to the Mississippi and the interior might well have remained solidly French. If you did somehow get to the Mississippi, there would be no Missouri River to take you to the Rocky Mountains. There would be no Detroit, Chicago or Milwaukee.
you meant something like that?
Answer:
pretty sure it's b. if it's not, forever shame me.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
According to Emerson a drawback of relying too much on books is that they become useless. Emerson's idea was that books were very good and useful when used with a purpose. But he thought that if you abused books, they were not good at all. His idea was that books serve as inspiration, as sources of references and information, but he thought that the important part was to live, to have life experiences.
Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882) was an American poet that influenced other writers for his particular style and view of life. He was the author of "Nature" and "The American Scholar."
Fed·er·al·ism
ˈfed(ə)rəˌlizəm/Submit
noun
the federal principle or system of government.
"the politics of federalism in Canada"
the principles of the Federalist Party.
noun: Federalism
in Canada, support of confederation in opposition to Quebec separatism.
The Judiciary Act of 1801<span> was a partisan political attempt by the </span>Federalists<span> in </span>Congress<span> and the John Quincy Adams administration to overcrowd the federal courts with </span>Federalists...<span> In an attempt to make sure this happened, they passed the Federal </span>Judiciary Act of 1801. The Act<span> reduced the number of Supreme Court Justices from the original six to five.</span>
