This should be false. Under the articles, the states were acceptably stable. The problem was that the national government its self was weak and had no money as they had no authority to tax the states. This change with the constitution which still keep the states as states but adhered much more to the new, divided government that did have the authority to impose a national tax on states. This also brought a bigger sense of unity within the states over time and the national governments strength would grow over time. Hope this helps or answered the question/statement.<span />
The Romans would develop road systems as they went along with their expansion. Every time they'd conquest new territory, they'd make sure to keep the new colonies controlled by facilitating access to them through the construction of new roads. In addition, the development of these routes was crucial to containing attacks and ensuring a successful defense of the Empire, as the armies would move move faster and arrive quickly to the territories in conflict.
This strategic emphasis in roads and bridges was vital to the success of their army. The routes were built specifically with speed of movement in mind, designing them mostly in straight lines for efficiency.
Hope this helps!
D is the closest. It is the opposing argument. <span />
Congress passage of a tax cut.
Answer:
c.it presented new keys to understanding Christianity
Explanation:
Calvin’s Institutes of the Christian Religion differ from the teachings of Luther because "it presented new keys to understanding Christianity."
This is evident in the fact that unlike Luther and most Christian doctrine at the time who believed in acquiring salvation through faith, John Calvin concluded that salvation is a matter of predestination and it's designed for some people only.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is option C "it presented new keys to understanding Christianity."
