Logging trees can be a highly controversial subject. On one hand, it provides our species with the resources we are accustomed to using in order to prosper and survive. However on the other hand, with each tree that is removed, countless living creatures lose their homes and have nowhere to go. The noise and commotion from this can cause others to leave simply because they are scared. Fire can benefit a forest by leaving room for regrowth and younger trees, but it kills so many animals that are a part of the very food web we depend on and are a part of. With more people, we need more jobs which is less money to go around, leading to poverty, and logging trees provides jobs. Older forests have been there longer and have housed living things for a long time, as well as the fact that the are stronger than young trees they can be much bigger and therefore provide much more oxygen and refuse the amount of carbon dioxide in the air. Clear cutting is much more destructive because selective cutting is less harmful to less creatures and we can pick trees that will benefit us the most. Should there ever be a flood, the less trees and other plants there are in the ground, the more soil will be displaced and the bigger mess there will be to clean up.
Answer:
Peak Im not sure if its correct though
Explanation:
Answer:
<u>Clothes</u>
Explanation:
An antecedent is a word, phrase or clause that a pronoun refers to. Therefore, a pronoun and its antecedent must agree in person (first, second, or third person) and in number (plural or singular).
In the sentence, the demonstrative pronoun "those", which is third-person plural, is referring to the noun "clothes", which it's third-person plural too.
The answer to this question is:
According to George Herbert mead, the term significant other refers to _"<span>individuals close enough to us to have a strong capacity to motivate our behavior"</span>_.
Hoped This Helped, Carmirezorozco7637
Your Welcome :)
